On Mar 20, 6:18 pm, Khmer Young <[email protected]> wrote:
> Kangaroo,
>
> SRP is the main cause of Khmer division? As I know SRP was created in
> 1998. After 1998, are there any outstanding division among Cambodian
> people? Please, give me all those events. And also give me the
> evidence that Sam Rainsy called Hun Sen Vietnamese. Thank you for your
> corporation.
>
Please read your above paragraph carefully. I don't think that is what
you are trying to say.
First of Sam Rainsy is not the only one who is practicing division in
Cambodia.
Look at the civil war in the last five decades. You should see one
Cambodian faction fights the other for their own rightiousness. Sam
Rainsy is one of them.
Cambodian society has been accommodating this kind of practice for a
very long time. They even went so far to get other countries to help
them fight their own people in their own country. Then they blame on
Vietnam.
You just can't stop using Hun Sen and CPP to justify your cause. If
you continue to think that it's ok for Sam Rainsy or others to do as
long as CPP is doing bad thing, STOP HERE. YOU DON'T NEED TO LOOK ANY
FURTHER. You are just one of those who only think about dividing
Cambodia. There are many rights and wrongs on earth. There are goods
and bads in any political parties. It's not how good one is to make a
country better. IT IS HOW ONE CAN GET IT ALL TO WORK TOGETHER FOR
DIFFERENT POINT OF VIEW. Sam Rainsy is not one of them.
> But in reality, CPP has good stand to marginalize others who sharply
> criticize their bad behavior. Not only SRP party as a political party
> has been labeled as the divisive one in Khmer society, civil societies
> have also accused like this, and individual Cambodians have also been
> accused of creating division in Cambodian society when they criticize
> the government. CPP government has paid less attention to the positive
> points of criticism. CPP's strategies are targeting everyone like
> enemies when they talk bad about their activities (is this like KR or
> not?). But not all CPP's members are like this. Only few of them
> including Kangaroo in this forum as well who label others as enemy
> when they criticize them.
>
Let us assume that CPP is so bad for the moment.
Why are Cambodians embrassing them?
Why did they vote for them in the last election, which international
monitors made it as the best election Cambodians had ever held?
Why did they reject Sam Rainsy if they loved him so much?
> However, my main debate is not about division, and also it is not
> about the election has been internationally recognized or not?
> Standard or not standard?
>
Your debate is about blaming CPP. No election will satisfy you as long
as the person you like is not in there.
That's the fact.
The international monitors had classified the last election as the
Cambodian best in a long time.
Now, do you want it to be like the ones we have in America?
Oh! If you do, keep dreaming.
> My main debate is about the outcome of 2008 national election. Only
> 53% of all valid votes 6 millions people that CPP got, but what can
> lift CPP up to get almost 90% of parliament seats? CPP got 90 seats
> among 123 seats through 53% of the valid votes????? What is this? What
> is this? What is this?
>
The outcome of the last electoin was that the people of Cambodia
rejected Sam Rainsy whether it was fair or not.
You said it yourself. ONLY 53% of votes went to CPP. Do you see it as
above 50%?
On the other hands, one must look at its individual vote of areas.
Cambodians overwhemingly rejected Sam Rainsy. They voted mostly to CPP
candidate to represent their voice in Phnom Penh.
Why dind't they vote more for Sam Rainsy?
He could not even retain what he had before. Today, Cambodians
rejected him openly due to his division.
Cambodians don't need anymore division for their society. They showed
it clearly in that election.
> NEC and CPP can freak all the procedures of national election, but NEC
> and CPP cannot freak the outcome of the election at all. This outcome
> shows us that neither CPP nor SRP can get the realistic seats from
> this election. These two parties are overwhelmingly deceived by the
> NEC.
>
No matter how you look at it. CPP has the most representative in the
senate and congress.
Hence, they will vote mostly for their party agenda. That's the way it
works.
CPP doesn't have to cater any of their opposition. That's exactly what
they are doing.
That's why Sam Rainsy is so down right now.
> So, do you get the point Kangaroo? What else you want blow out more
> now?
>
And now did you get the point?
> KY
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Cambodia Discussion (CAMDISC) - www.cambodia.org" group.
This is an unmoderated forum. Please refrain from using foul language.
Thank you for your understanding. Peace among us and in Cambodia.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/camdisc
Learn more - http://www.cambodia.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
