On 23, May 2006, at 9:38, Julian wrote:
> Anderton and Standedge should have been left as pay per use.
> Why should I have to pay for something that in one case I can't use
> and in
> the other I am very unlikely to use as I cant get very far when I get
> to the
> top!
I'm an advocate of pay-to-use on these.
> I already have to pay for 1/3 of the system that is unavailable to me
That's your own fault for choosing a boat that is too wide ! You
already displace twice as much water as you pay for, though I suppose
that does keep the water levels up for the rest of us.
Beeky, now where did I leave that parapet
SPONSORED LINKS
| Sports fund raising | Sports psychology degree | Sport psychology college |
| Sport psychology course | Sport nutrition | Outdoor recreation |
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "canals-list" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
