> Anderton and Standedge should have been left as pay per use.
> Why should I have to pay for something that in one case I can't use and in
> the other I am very unlikely to use as I cant get very far when I get to the
> top!
Sorry can't go with that logic. My boat is 70ft long (no northern
waterways) 7ft wide (no Llangollen) draws almost 3ft (allegedly no
southern Stratford) and has an undersized engine (no rivers). To be
really pedantic I also single hand so probably no wide canals either.
What proportion of the licence fee would I pay following your logic? I'm
of the view that this would be the first step down the pay per use
path across the network and I for one am completely opposed to this,
even though I won't ever use over half of it.
Steve
NB Bream (and naturally supporting the discount for historic craft ;-) )
SPONSORED LINKS
| Sports fund raising | Sports psychology degree | Sport psychology college |
| Sport psychology course | Sport nutrition | Outdoor recreation |
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "canals-list" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
