"Neil Arlidge"
<[email protected]> wrote:

>Adrian Stott wrote:
>> "Roger Millin" <[email protected]>
>> wrote:

>>> Hhmm, that's interesting and something I didn't know. So, on that
>>> basis, if one wished to keep one's boat on the Thames at Oxford but
>>> only wished to cruise the canals (via the South Oxford) then EA
>>> wouldn't want a licence? Hhmm, I don't think so ;-))) Or doesn't
>>> that principle work further upstream? Roger
>>
>> I think it applies everywhere where the navigation authority is in the
>> business of running moorings just off the waters of another navigation
>> authority.
>
>Oh good, that means that BW licence holders can do the Nene and Great Ouse 
>for free, to get to BW Priory Marina in Bedford.

Neil, I think you overlooked the word "just" in my reply.

However, once the GU Bedford branch is built ...

Brian on Harnser <[email protected]>
wrote:

>There use to be something similar on the Trent with boats being allowed 
>into Stockworth Basin, something to do with safe haven from a tide way.

I asked BW (Jon Guest) about this at the user meeting.  He said
Limehouse Basin is not a haven.  I said I felt that quite a lot of
people might think otherwise (especially those with engine trouble on
the tideway) .

Adrian

Adrian Stott
07956-299966

Reply via email to