Adrian Stott wrote: > "Neil Arlidge" > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Adrian Stott wrote: >>> "Roger Millin" >>> <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> Hhmm, that's interesting and something I didn't know. So, on that >>>> basis, if one wished to keep one's boat on the Thames at Oxford but >>>> only wished to cruise the canals (via the South Oxford) then EA >>>> wouldn't want a licence? Hhmm, I don't think so ;-))) Or doesn't >>>> that principle work further upstream? Roger >>> >>> I think it applies everywhere where the navigation authority is in >>> the business of running moorings just off the waters of another >>> navigation authority. >> >> Oh good, that means that BW licence holders can do the Nene and >> Great Ouse for free, to get to BW Priory Marina in Bedford. > > Neil, I think you overlooked the word "just" in my reply. > > However, once the GU Bedford branch is built ... > > Brian on Harnser <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> There use to be something similar on the Trent with boats being >> allowed into Stockworth Basin, something to do with safe haven from >> a tide way. > > I asked BW (Jon Guest) about this at the user meeting. He said > Limehouse Basin is not a haven. I said I felt that quite a lot of > people might think otherwise (especially those with engine trouble on > the tideway) . > > Adrian
Yeah!....but if you have engine trouble you would never get on the tucked away pontoons :-) -- Neil Arlidge NB Earnest - Out of it. TNC...The Wilderness Years... http://www.tuesdaynightclub.co.uk/tour.html
