Hi, what you say about the improvements in care2x are right from a certain point of view. but, for me, as I see it, is very difficult to add all the features I'll wish. at least with this codebase. if you calculate a bit what has been added to the actual project in this year, you'll notice that it isn't very much. not because there aren't good programmer here, but because the actual codebase is very difficult to handle : no coding standards, old architecture, to much useless code and a lot of other small things.
as, for me there are only to possible ways of updating care2x. first, rewrite it all from scratch second, transform the code towards a more modern architecture. wich is what I'm doing actually. regards gjergji Tim Schofield wrote: > Hi, Just though I would put my two penneth into this discussion. I > have been following this mailing list for a while now, and feel a > little bit frustrated with this project. It seems to me that care2k > has become a reasonable product by v2.5, and is on the way to becoming > a good product. > > Then it seems it was decided to scrap all this good work and rewrite > it from scratch. Why? It seems to me that the way forward is one of > continuous improvement to the base product we have. > > It also seems to me that the project has become so wrapped up in the > tools that it wants to use, that it has forgotten what its purpose > was. That is to produce good open source software for use in > hospitals. > > My advice is to take what we have that is working (ie v2.5), look for > a way to improve it, and do that. When that is done, look for another > way to improve it, and do that. > > Anyway, enough from me, just let me finish by saying _please_ dont let > this project die, by spending years deliberating over this framework, > or that set of tools etc > > Thanks > Tim > > > On 11/02/2008, Dott Claudio G. Torbinio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hi carers >> As i can see, as part of the project, is that we are talking over the >> same stuffs, still feb 2007 >> The same talking, te same FW talking, the same CMS talking... >> There is somethink does not work. In one year i can rewrite code, port >> the project, make 1000 more activityes.... >> But only talk about... is a poor result. >> Now someone can agree with me how hard is decide... >> By my side i can agree or not with decision, but i am always, still, >> ever hard working. >> Please decide somethink >> BR >> Claudio G. Torbinio >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > Care2002-developers mailing list > Care2002-developers@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/care2002-developers > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Care2002-developers mailing list Care2002-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/care2002-developers
