On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 7:30 AM, Ian Holsman <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On 27/06/2009, at 1:05 AM, Eric Evans wrote: > >> >> Ok, this raises a question for me. Assuming that we were to develop an >> RTC work-flow that included Git for version control and Gerrit for code >> review, would there still be a requirement to attach patches to the Jira >> issue? >> >> > comitters have signed a CLA already, and that applies to anything they > check in. > so RTC or CTR doesn't really affect that. people who aren't comitters will > still have to submit JIRAs/whatever and check the button to get code into > the system. we could change the wording to say the patch/pointer to the > patch is CLA'd. > You sure that's OK? We had this conversation about Thrift with some of the Apache guys a while back, and at that point they said that, even if you have a CLA on file, you still have to explicitly grant each change to the ASF. Is this a policy change or is it just not well defined yet? -Todd
