would multitargetting be able to pick up different versions of
dependencies from different subfolders?

like:
..\tools\net-35\nunit.dll
..\tools\sl-30\nunit.dll

On 12 Kwi, 10:16, John Simons <[email protected]> wrote:
> Roelof,
>
> My wish is satisfied with MSBuild multitargetting :)
> Very nice 
> read:http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee395432%28v=VS.100%29.aspx
>
> My only concern is that if we go down this path, we basically saying
> that we only support VS2010 from now on, which btw is not a problem
> for me ;)
>
> Cheers
> John
>
> On Apr 12, 6:02 pm, Roelof Blom <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > I could be way off, but IMHO the multi-targeting support in MSBuild 4.0 is
> > able create binaries for different platforms from a single set of project
> > files.
>
> > So contrary to John's wish I would love to see only one solution for each
> > project. More sln/csproj means more work, even if using a tool, and it will
> > clutter the root folder of each project even more than today.
>
> > On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 8:20 AM, Julian Birch <[email protected]>wrote:
>
> > > It's basically the same as the assemblyinfo.cs issue: we exclude
> > > because it would complicate source control.  The only problem is,
> > > Roelof's code to auto-generate them relies on there being a solution
> > > in the first place, which doesn't apply in this case.
>
> > > I would love it if we could come up with a better solution to this
> > > problem.  But at the moment all I can think of as an alternative is
> > > complex check-ins which keep all the solutions up to date.  And then
> > > you get problems if someone modifies two solutions in different
> > > ways...
>
> > > J
>
> > > On Sunday, April 11, 2010, John Simons <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > Julian,
>
> > > > What do you mean by "-SL3 and other solutions are generated by the
> > > > build" ?
>
> > > > Regarding solution + project files, I would like to see all our
> > > > projects to have a solution and project files for:
> > > > - VS2008
> > > > - VS2010
> > > > - VS2010 + SL4
> > > > - VS2008 + SL3
>
> > > > This makes it easier for anyone to pop the solution open and work on
> > > > it.
> > > > No "run this before" or "sorry we don't have that"!
>
> > > > Cheers
> > > > John
>
> > > > On Apr 12, 1:15 am, Julian Birch <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >> Hi, sorry to make it more clear:
>
> > > >>    - We keep a master sln and csproj file (maybe two) called -vs2008 or
> > > >>    -vs2010.
> > > >>    - -SL3 and other solutions are generated by the build.
>
> > > >> That's basically how Solution Transform works: have a master project 
> > > >> and
> > > all
> > > >> the others are generated from it.  This keeps synchronization costs to 
> > > >> a
> > > >> minimum.
>
> > > >> As far as your moq problems go, though, I think you may need to 
> > > >> approach
> > > it
> > > >> a different way.  Is it possible to run WP7 code hosted within ordinary
> > > .NET
> > > >> code?  That'd solve the problem (ish).
>
> > > >> J
>
> > > >> On 11 April 2010 16:04, Michael Sync <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > >> > Hi Julian,
>
> > > >> > Why do you want to remove sln and csproj files? How shall we open the
> > > >> > project in Visual Studio?
>
> > > >> > >>Add cmd file to generate alternative projects.
>
> > > >> > I'm not very sure on this. What kind of projects that you want to
> > > generate
> > > >> > from console?
>
> > > >> > Thanks and Best Regards,
> > > >> > Michael Sync
>
> > > >> > Don't go the way life takes you.
> > > >> > Take life the way you go
>
> > > >> >http://michaelsync.net
>
> > > >> > On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 9:49 PM, Julian Birch <[email protected]
> > > >wrote:
>
> > > >> >> Krzysztof has checked out the new SL build, and has identified the
> > > >> >> following tasks once I've got my new machine:
>
> > > >> >>    - Remove superfluous SLN/CSPROJ files (me)
> > > >> >>    - Standardize naming.  (-SL to -SL3, others???) (me)
> > > >> >>    - Add cmd file to generate alternative projects. (me)
> > > >> >>    - Get SL3 on CI server using msbuild integration (Krzysztof)
>
> > > >> >> Anything else anyone can think of before we switch over?
>
> > > >> >> J
>
> > > >> >> --
> > > >> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > > Groups
> > > >> >> "Castle Project Development List" group.
> > > >> >> To post to this group, send email to
> > > >> >> [email protected].
> > > >> >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > >> >> [email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]>
> > > <castle-project-devel%[email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]>
>
> > > >> >> .
> > > >> >> For more options, visit this group at
> > > >> >>http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
>
> > > >> >  --
> > > >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > > Groups
> > > >> > "Castle Project Development List" group.
> > > >> > To post to this group, send email to
> > > [email protected]
> > > >> > .
> > > >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > >> > [email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]>
> > > <castle-project-devel%[email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]>
>
> > > >> > .
> > > >> > For more options, visit this group at
> > > >> >http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
>
> > > > --
> > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> > > > Groups
> > > "Castle Project Development List" group.
> > > > To post to this group, send email to
> > > [email protected].
> > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > [email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]>
> > > .
> > > > For more options, visit this group at
> > >http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
>
> > > --
> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > > "Castle Project Development List" group.
> > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> > > .
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > [email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]>
> > > .
> > > For more options, visit this group at
> > >http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Castle Project Development List" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.

Reply via email to