Here is the error we getting: http://builds.castleproject.org/viewLog.html?tab=buildLog&buildTypeId=bt21&buildId=5371 when trying to use xbuild.
There seems to be also a lot of projects still configured to build with nant for mono + svn! Cheers John On Apr 13, 8:50 am, John Simons <[email protected]> wrote: > Right now the reason builds are failing is because the agent is > disconnected:http://builds.castleproject.org/agents.html?unregistered=true > But before that i think it was because we are not using nant and > instead are using msbuild. > > > if we get a build agent with mono on windows. > > What's wrong with using the build agent we already have for .net3.5? > All we have to do is install mono for windows on that machine :) > > Cheers > John > > On Apr 13, 8:07 am, Krzysztof Koźmic <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > if we get a build agent with mono on windows. > > > Why do mono builds fail on Linux btw? > > is that because of MsBuild? > > > W dniu 12 kwietnia 2010 23:20 użytkownik John Simons > > <[email protected]> napisał: > > > > How about mono builds? > > > Which btw have been broken for the last 2 mths! > > > > I think mono builds would work fine if we do it in windows instead and > > > this way at least we have a mono build that works and we are able to > > > debug if required, thoughts? > > > > Cheers > > > John > > > > On Apr 12, 11:58 pm, Krzysztof Koźmic (2) <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> ok, as long as it works I don't really care. > > > >> What about .NET 4 and SL 4 support. Can we start doing builds for > > >> these please? > > >> And can we fix SL3 build (migrate it to multitargetting if needed). > > > >> Do all committers have access to VS2010? > > >> For the beginning there should be 90days trial available so that we > > >> get 3 months before we upgrade. > > > >> Krzysztof > > > >> On 12 Kwi, 15:33, Roelof Blom <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> > Yes, you can make assembly references conditional. It looks a bit > > >> > weird in > > >> > the VSNET UI though, you'll have multiple occurences of the same > > >> > assembly in > > >> > the references list, with a small yellow exclamation mark next to it. > > >> > It works correctly though. > > > >> > Here's some good info on it:http://goo.gl/JzFRhttp://goo.gl/oCyZ > > > >> > -- Roelof. > > > >> > 2010/4/12 Krzysztof Ko 1/4 mic (2) <[email protected]> > > > >> > > would multitargetting be able to pick up different versions of > > >> > > dependencies from different subfolders? > > > >> > > like: > > >> > > ..\tools\net-35\nunit.dll > > >> > > ..\tools\sl-30\nunit.dll > > > >> > > On 12 Kwi, 10:16, John Simons <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> > > > Roelof, > > > >> > > > My wish is satisfied with MSBuild multitargetting :) > > >> > > > Very nice read: > > >> > >http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee395432%28v=VS.100%29.aspx > > > >> > > > My only concern is that if we go down this path, we basically > > >> > > > saying > > >> > > > that we only support VS2010 from now on, which btw is not a problem > > >> > > > for me ;) > > > >> > > > Cheers > > >> > > > John > > > >> > > > On Apr 12, 6:02 pm, Roelof Blom <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> > > > > I could be way off, but IMHO the multi-targeting support in > > >> > > > > MSBuild 4.0 > > >> > > is > > >> > > > > able create binaries for different platforms from a single set of > > >> > > project > > >> > > > > files. > > > >> > > > > So contrary to John's wish I would love to see only one solution > > >> > > > > for > > >> > > each > > >> > > > > project. More sln/csproj means more work, even if using a tool, > > >> > > > > and it > > >> > > will > > >> > > > > clutter the root folder of each project even more than today. > > > >> > > > > On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 8:20 AM, Julian Birch > > >> > > > > <[email protected] > > >> > > >wrote: > > > >> > > > > > It's basically the same as the assemblyinfo.cs issue: we > > >> > > > > > exclude > > >> > > > > > because it would complicate source control. The only problem > > >> > > > > > is, > > >> > > > > > Roelof's code to auto-generate them relies on there being a > > >> > > > > > solution > > >> > > > > > in the first place, which doesn't apply in this case. > > > >> > > > > > I would love it if we could come up with a better solution to > > >> > > > > > this > > >> > > > > > problem. But at the moment all I can think of as an > > >> > > > > > alternative is > > >> > > > > > complex check-ins which keep all the solutions up to date. > > >> > > > > > And then > > >> > > > > > you get problems if someone modifies two solutions in different > > >> > > > > > ways... > > > >> > > > > > J > > > >> > > > > > On Sunday, April 11, 2010, John Simons > > >> > > > > > <[email protected]> > > >> > > wrote: > > >> > > > > > > Julian, > > > >> > > > > > > What do you mean by "-SL3 and other solutions are generated > > >> > > > > > > by the > > >> > > > > > > build" ? > > > >> > > > > > > Regarding solution + project files, I would like to see all > > >> > > > > > > our > > >> > > > > > > projects to have a solution and project files for: > > >> > > > > > > - VS2008 > > >> > > > > > > - VS2010 > > >> > > > > > > - VS2010 + SL4 > > >> > > > > > > - VS2008 + SL3 > > > >> > > > > > > This makes it easier for anyone to pop the solution open and > > >> > > > > > > work > > >> > > on > > >> > > > > > > it. > > >> > > > > > > No "run this before" or "sorry we don't have that"! > > > >> > > > > > > Cheers > > >> > > > > > > John > > > >> > > > > > > On Apr 12, 1:15 am, Julian Birch <[email protected]> > > >> > > > > > > wrote: > > >> > > > > > >> Hi, sorry to make it more clear: > > > >> > > > > > >> - We keep a master sln and csproj file (maybe two) called > > >> > > -vs2008 or > > >> > > > > > >> -vs2010. > > >> > > > > > >> - -SL3 and other solutions are generated by the build. > > > >> > > > > > >> That's basically how Solution Transform works: have a master > > >> > > project and > > >> > > > > > all > > >> > > > > > >> the others are generated from it. This keeps > > >> > > > > > >> synchronization > > >> > > costs to a > > >> > > > > > >> minimum. > > > >> > > > > > >> As far as your moq problems go, though, I think you may > > >> > > > > > >> need to > > >> > > approach > > >> > > > > > it > > >> > > > > > >> a different way. Is it possible to run WP7 code hosted > > >> > > > > > >> within > > >> > > ordinary > > >> > > > > > .NET > > >> > > > > > >> code? That'd solve the problem (ish). > > > >> > > > > > >> J > > > >> > > > > > >> On 11 April 2010 16:04, Michael Sync <[email protected]> > > >> > > > > > >> wrote: > > > >> > > > > > >> > Hi Julian, > > > >> > > > > > >> > Why do you want to remove sln and csproj files? How shall > > >> > > > > > >> > we > > >> > > open the > > >> > > > > > >> > project in Visual Studio? > > > >> > > > > > >> > >>Add cmd file to generate alternative projects. > > > >> > > > > > >> > I'm not very sure on this. What kind of projects that you > > >> > > > > > >> > want > > >> > > to > > >> > > > > > generate > > >> > > > > > >> > from console? > > > >> > > > > > >> > Thanks and Best Regards, > > >> > > > > > >> > Michael Sync > > > >> > > > > > >> > Don't go the way life takes you. > > >> > > > > > >> > Take life the way you go > > > >> > > > > > >> >http://michaelsync.net > > > >> > > > > > >> > On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 9:49 PM, Julian Birch < > > >> > > [email protected] > > >> > > > > > >wrote: > > > >> > > > > > >> >> Krzysztof has checked out the new SL build, and has > > >> > > > > > >> >> identified > > >> > > the > > >> > > > > > >> >> following tasks once I've got my new machine: > > > >> > > > > > >> >> - Remove superfluous SLN/CSPROJ files (me) > > >> > > > > > >> >> - Standardize naming. (-SL to -SL3, others???) (me) > > >> > > > > > >> >> - Add cmd file to generate alternative projects. (me) > > >> > > > > > >> >> - Get SL3 on CI server using msbuild integration > > >> > > > > > >> >> (Krzysztof) > > > >> > > > > > >> >> Anything else anyone can think of before we switch over? > > > >> > > > > > >> >> J > > > >> > > > > > >> >> -- > > >> > > > > > >> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to > > >> > > > > > >> >> the > > >> > > Google > > >> > > > > > Groups > > >> > > > > > >> >> "Castle Project Development List" group. > > >> > > > > > >> >> To post to this group, send email to > > >> > > > > > >> >> [email protected]. > > >> > > > > > >> >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > >> > > > > > >> >> [email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]> > > >> > > <castle-project-devel%[email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]> > > > >> > > > > > <castle-project-devel%[email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]> > > >> > > <castle-project-devel%[email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]> > > > >> > > > > > >> >> . > > >> > > > > > >> >> For more options, visit this group at > > >> > > > > > >> >>http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. > > > >> > > > > > >> > -- > > >> > > > > > >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to > > >> > > > > > >> > the > > >> > > Google > > >> > > > > > Groups > > >> > > > > > >> > "Castle Project Development List" group. > > >> > > > > > >> > To post to this group, send email to > > >> > > > > > [email protected] > > >> > > > > > >> > . > > >> > > > > > >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > >> > > > > > >> > [email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]> > > >> > > <castle-project-devel%[email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]> > > > >> > > > > > <castle-project-devel%[email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]> > > >> > > <castle-project-devel%[email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]> > > > >> > > > > > >> > . > > >> > > > > > >> > For more options, visit this group at > > >> > > > > > >> >http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. > > > >> > > > > > > -- > > >> > > > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the > > >> > > > > > > Google > > >> > > Groups > > >> > > > > > "Castle Project Development List" group. > > >> > > > > > > To post to this group, send email to > > >> > > > > > [email protected]. > > >> > > > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > >> > > > > > [email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]> > > >> > > <castle-project-devel%[email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]> > > > >> > > > > > . > > >> > > > > > > For more options, visit this group at > > >> > > > > >http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. > > > >> > > > > > -- > > >> > > > > > You received this message because you are > > ... > > read more >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
