How about mono builds?
Which btw have been broken for the last 2 mths!

I think mono builds would work fine if we do it in windows instead and
this way at least we have a mono build that works and we are able to
debug if required, thoughts?

Cheers
John

On Apr 12, 11:58 pm, Krzysztof Koźmic (2) <[email protected]> wrote:
> ok, as long as it works I don't really care.
>
> What about .NET 4 and SL 4 support. Can we start doing builds for
> these please?
> And can we fix SL3 build (migrate it to multitargetting if needed).
>
> Do all committers have access to VS2010?
> For the beginning there should be 90days trial available so that we
> get 3 months before we upgrade.
>
> Krzysztof
>
> On 12 Kwi, 15:33, Roelof Blom <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Yes, you can make assembly references conditional. It looks a bit weird in
> > the VSNET UI though, you'll have multiple occurences of the same assembly in
> > the references list, with a small yellow exclamation mark next to it.
> > It works correctly though.
>
> > Here's some good info on it:http://goo.gl/JzFRhttp://goo.gl/oCyZ
>
> > -- Roelof.
>
> > 2010/4/12 Krzysztof Ko 1/4 mic (2) <[email protected]>
>
> > > would multitargetting be able to pick up different versions of
> > > dependencies from different subfolders?
>
> > > like:
> > > ..\tools\net-35\nunit.dll
> > > ..\tools\sl-30\nunit.dll
>
> > > On 12 Kwi, 10:16, John Simons <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > Roelof,
>
> > > > My wish is satisfied with MSBuild multitargetting :)
> > > > Very nice read:
> > >http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee395432%28v=VS.100%29.aspx
>
> > > > My only concern is that if we go down this path, we basically saying
> > > > that we only support VS2010 from now on, which btw is not a problem
> > > > for me ;)
>
> > > > Cheers
> > > > John
>
> > > > On Apr 12, 6:02 pm, Roelof Blom <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > I could be way off, but IMHO the multi-targeting support in MSBuild 
> > > > > 4.0
> > > is
> > > > > able create binaries for different platforms from a single set of
> > > project
> > > > > files.
>
> > > > > So contrary to John's wish I would love to see only one solution for
> > > each
> > > > > project. More sln/csproj means more work, even if using a tool, and it
> > > will
> > > > > clutter the root folder of each project even more than today.
>
> > > > > On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 8:20 AM, Julian Birch <[email protected]
> > > >wrote:
>
> > > > > > It's basically the same as the assemblyinfo.cs issue: we exclude
> > > > > > because it would complicate source control.  The only problem is,
> > > > > > Roelof's code to auto-generate them relies on there being a solution
> > > > > > in the first place, which doesn't apply in this case.
>
> > > > > > I would love it if we could come up with a better solution to this
> > > > > > problem.  But at the moment all I can think of as an alternative is
> > > > > > complex check-ins which keep all the solutions up to date.  And then
> > > > > > you get problems if someone modifies two solutions in different
> > > > > > ways...
>
> > > > > > J
>
> > > > > > On Sunday, April 11, 2010, John Simons <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > > > Julian,
>
> > > > > > > What do you mean by "-SL3 and other solutions are generated by the
> > > > > > > build" ?
>
> > > > > > > Regarding solution + project files, I would like to see all our
> > > > > > > projects to have a solution and project files for:
> > > > > > > - VS2008
> > > > > > > - VS2010
> > > > > > > - VS2010 + SL4
> > > > > > > - VS2008 + SL3
>
> > > > > > > This makes it easier for anyone to pop the solution open and work
> > > on
> > > > > > > it.
> > > > > > > No "run this before" or "sorry we don't have that"!
>
> > > > > > > Cheers
> > > > > > > John
>
> > > > > > > On Apr 12, 1:15 am, Julian Birch <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > > >> Hi, sorry to make it more clear:
>
> > > > > > >>    - We keep a master sln and csproj file (maybe two) called
> > > -vs2008 or
> > > > > > >>    -vs2010.
> > > > > > >>    - -SL3 and other solutions are generated by the build.
>
> > > > > > >> That's basically how Solution Transform works: have a master
> > > project and
> > > > > > all
> > > > > > >> the others are generated from it.  This keeps synchronization
> > > costs to a
> > > > > > >> minimum.
>
> > > > > > >> As far as your moq problems go, though, I think you may need to
> > > approach
> > > > > > it
> > > > > > >> a different way.  Is it possible to run WP7 code hosted within
> > > ordinary
> > > > > > .NET
> > > > > > >> code?  That'd solve the problem (ish).
>
> > > > > > >> J
>
> > > > > > >> On 11 April 2010 16:04, Michael Sync <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > >> > Hi Julian,
>
> > > > > > >> > Why do you want to remove sln and csproj files? How shall we
> > > open the
> > > > > > >> > project in Visual Studio?
>
> > > > > > >> > >>Add cmd file to generate alternative projects.
>
> > > > > > >> > I'm not very sure on this. What kind of projects that you want
> > > to
> > > > > > generate
> > > > > > >> > from console?
>
> > > > > > >> > Thanks and Best Regards,
> > > > > > >> > Michael Sync
>
> > > > > > >> > Don't go the way life takes you.
> > > > > > >> > Take life the way you go
>
> > > > > > >> >http://michaelsync.net
>
> > > > > > >> > On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 9:49 PM, Julian Birch <
> > > [email protected]
> > > > > > >wrote:
>
> > > > > > >> >> Krzysztof has checked out the new SL build, and has identified
> > > the
> > > > > > >> >> following tasks once I've got my new machine:
>
> > > > > > >> >>    - Remove superfluous SLN/CSPROJ files (me)
> > > > > > >> >>    - Standardize naming.  (-SL to -SL3, others???) (me)
> > > > > > >> >>    - Add cmd file to generate alternative projects. (me)
> > > > > > >> >>    - Get SL3 on CI server using msbuild integration 
> > > > > > >> >> (Krzysztof)
>
> > > > > > >> >> Anything else anyone can think of before we switch over?
>
> > > > > > >> >> J
>
> > > > > > >> >> --
> > > > > > >> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the
> > > Google
> > > > > > Groups
> > > > > > >> >> "Castle Project Development List" group.
> > > > > > >> >> To post to this group, send email to
> > > > > > >> >> [email protected].
> > > > > > >> >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > > > > >> >> [email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]>
> > > <castle-project-devel%[email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]>
>
> > > > > > <castle-project-devel%[email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]>
> > > <castle-project-devel%[email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]>
>
> > > > > > >> >> .
> > > > > > >> >> For more options, visit this group at
> > > > > > >> >>http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
>
> > > > > > >> >  --
> > > > > > >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the
> > > Google
> > > > > > Groups
> > > > > > >> > "Castle Project Development List" group.
> > > > > > >> > To post to this group, send email to
> > > > > > [email protected]
> > > > > > >> > .
> > > > > > >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > > > > >> > [email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]>
> > > <castle-project-devel%[email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]>
>
> > > > > > <castle-project-devel%[email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]>
> > > <castle-project-devel%[email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]>
>
> > > > > > >> > .
> > > > > > >> > For more options, visit this group at
> > > > > > >> >http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
>
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > > Groups
> > > > > > "Castle Project Development List" group.
> > > > > > > To post to this group, send email to
> > > > > > [email protected].
> > > > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > > > > [email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]>
> > > <castle-project-devel%[email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]>
>
> > > > > > .
> > > > > > > For more options, visit this group at
> > > > > >http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
>
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > > Groups
> > > > > > "Castle Project Development List" group.
> > > > > > To post to this group, send email to
> > > [email protected]
> > > > > > .
> > > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > > > > [email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]>
> > > <castle-project-devel%[email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]>
>
> > > > > > .
> > > > > > For more options, visit this group at
> > > > > >http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
>
> > > --
> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > > "Castle Project Development List" group.
> > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> > > .
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > [email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]>
> > > .
> > > For more options, visit this group at
> > >http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Castle Project Development List" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.

Reply via email to