About mono and xbuild: http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel/msg/6d10135332287a32
Cheers, Henry Conceição 2010/4/12 John Simons <[email protected]>: > Here is the error we getting: > http://builds.castleproject.org/viewLog.html?tab=buildLog&buildTypeId=bt21&buildId=5371 > when trying to use xbuild. > > There seems to be also a lot of projects still configured to build > with nant for mono + svn! > > Cheers > John > > On Apr 13, 8:50 am, John Simons <[email protected]> wrote: >> Right now the reason builds are failing is because the agent is >> disconnected:http://builds.castleproject.org/agents.html?unregistered=true >> But before that i think it was because we are not using nant and >> instead are using msbuild. >> >> > if we get a build agent with mono on windows. >> >> What's wrong with using the build agent we already have for .net3.5? >> All we have to do is install mono for windows on that machine :) >> >> Cheers >> John >> >> On Apr 13, 8:07 am, Krzysztof Koźmic <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> > if we get a build agent with mono on windows. >> >> > Why do mono builds fail on Linux btw? >> > is that because of MsBuild? >> >> > W dniu 12 kwietnia 2010 23:20 użytkownik John Simons >> > <[email protected]> napisał: >> >> > > How about mono builds? >> > > Which btw have been broken for the last 2 mths! >> >> > > I think mono builds would work fine if we do it in windows instead and >> > > this way at least we have a mono build that works and we are able to >> > > debug if required, thoughts? >> >> > > Cheers >> > > John >> >> > > On Apr 12, 11:58 pm, Krzysztof Koźmic (2) <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> ok, as long as it works I don't really care. >> >> > >> What about .NET 4 and SL 4 support. Can we start doing builds for >> > >> these please? >> > >> And can we fix SL3 build (migrate it to multitargetting if needed). >> >> > >> Do all committers have access to VS2010? >> > >> For the beginning there should be 90days trial available so that we >> > >> get 3 months before we upgrade. >> >> > >> Krzysztof >> >> > >> On 12 Kwi, 15:33, Roelof Blom <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > >> > Yes, you can make assembly references conditional. It looks a bit >> > >> > weird in >> > >> > the VSNET UI though, you'll have multiple occurences of the same >> > >> > assembly in >> > >> > the references list, with a small yellow exclamation mark next to it. >> > >> > It works correctly though. >> >> > >> > Here's some good info on it:http://goo.gl/JzFRhttp://goo.gl/oCyZ >> >> > >> > -- Roelof. >> >> > >> > 2010/4/12 Krzysztof Ko 1/4 mic (2) <[email protected]> >> >> > >> > > would multitargetting be able to pick up different versions of >> > >> > > dependencies from different subfolders? >> >> > >> > > like: >> > >> > > ..\tools\net-35\nunit.dll >> > >> > > ..\tools\sl-30\nunit.dll >> >> > >> > > On 12 Kwi, 10:16, John Simons <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > > > Roelof, >> >> > >> > > > My wish is satisfied with MSBuild multitargetting :) >> > >> > > > Very nice read: >> > >> > >http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee395432%28v=VS.100%29.aspx >> >> > >> > > > My only concern is that if we go down this path, we basically >> > >> > > > saying >> > >> > > > that we only support VS2010 from now on, which btw is not a >> > >> > > > problem >> > >> > > > for me ;) >> >> > >> > > > Cheers >> > >> > > > John >> >> > >> > > > On Apr 12, 6:02 pm, Roelof Blom <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > >> > > > > I could be way off, but IMHO the multi-targeting support in >> > >> > > > > MSBuild 4.0 >> > >> > > is >> > >> > > > > able create binaries for different platforms from a single set >> > >> > > > > of >> > >> > > project >> > >> > > > > files. >> >> > >> > > > > So contrary to John's wish I would love to see only one >> > >> > > > > solution for >> > >> > > each >> > >> > > > > project. More sln/csproj means more work, even if using a tool, >> > >> > > > > and it >> > >> > > will >> > >> > > > > clutter the root folder of each project even more than today. >> >> > >> > > > > On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 8:20 AM, Julian Birch >> > >> > > > > <[email protected] >> > >> > > >wrote: >> >> > >> > > > > > It's basically the same as the assemblyinfo.cs issue: we >> > >> > > > > > exclude >> > >> > > > > > because it would complicate source control. The only problem >> > >> > > > > > is, >> > >> > > > > > Roelof's code to auto-generate them relies on there being a >> > >> > > > > > solution >> > >> > > > > > in the first place, which doesn't apply in this case. >> >> > >> > > > > > I would love it if we could come up with a better solution to >> > >> > > > > > this >> > >> > > > > > problem. But at the moment all I can think of as an >> > >> > > > > > alternative is >> > >> > > > > > complex check-ins which keep all the solutions up to date. >> > >> > > > > > And then >> > >> > > > > > you get problems if someone modifies two solutions in >> > >> > > > > > different >> > >> > > > > > ways... >> >> > >> > > > > > J >> >> > >> > > > > > On Sunday, April 11, 2010, John Simons >> > >> > > > > > <[email protected]> >> > >> > > wrote: >> > >> > > > > > > Julian, >> >> > >> > > > > > > What do you mean by "-SL3 and other solutions are generated >> > >> > > > > > > by the >> > >> > > > > > > build" ? >> >> > >> > > > > > > Regarding solution + project files, I would like to see all >> > >> > > > > > > our >> > >> > > > > > > projects to have a solution and project files for: >> > >> > > > > > > - VS2008 >> > >> > > > > > > - VS2010 >> > >> > > > > > > - VS2010 + SL4 >> > >> > > > > > > - VS2008 + SL3 >> >> > >> > > > > > > This makes it easier for anyone to pop the solution open >> > >> > > > > > > and work >> > >> > > on >> > >> > > > > > > it. >> > >> > > > > > > No "run this before" or "sorry we don't have that"! >> >> > >> > > > > > > Cheers >> > >> > > > > > > John >> >> > >> > > > > > > On Apr 12, 1:15 am, Julian Birch <[email protected]> >> > >> > > > > > > wrote: >> > >> > > > > > >> Hi, sorry to make it more clear: >> >> > >> > > > > > >> - We keep a master sln and csproj file (maybe two) >> > >> > > > > > >> called >> > >> > > -vs2008 or >> > >> > > > > > >> -vs2010. >> > >> > > > > > >> - -SL3 and other solutions are generated by the build. >> >> > >> > > > > > >> That's basically how Solution Transform works: have a >> > >> > > > > > >> master >> > >> > > project and >> > >> > > > > > all >> > >> > > > > > >> the others are generated from it. This keeps >> > >> > > > > > >> synchronization >> > >> > > costs to a >> > >> > > > > > >> minimum. >> >> > >> > > > > > >> As far as your moq problems go, though, I think you may >> > >> > > > > > >> need to >> > >> > > approach >> > >> > > > > > it >> > >> > > > > > >> a different way. Is it possible to run WP7 code hosted >> > >> > > > > > >> within >> > >> > > ordinary >> > >> > > > > > .NET >> > >> > > > > > >> code? That'd solve the problem (ish). >> >> > >> > > > > > >> J >> >> > >> > > > > > >> On 11 April 2010 16:04, Michael Sync <[email protected]> >> > >> > > > > > >> wrote: >> >> > >> > > > > > >> > Hi Julian, >> >> > >> > > > > > >> > Why do you want to remove sln and csproj files? How >> > >> > > > > > >> > shall we >> > >> > > open the >> > >> > > > > > >> > project in Visual Studio? >> >> > >> > > > > > >> > >>Add cmd file to generate alternative projects. >> >> > >> > > > > > >> > I'm not very sure on this. What kind of projects that >> > >> > > > > > >> > you want >> > >> > > to >> > >> > > > > > generate >> > >> > > > > > >> > from console? >> >> > >> > > > > > >> > Thanks and Best Regards, >> > >> > > > > > >> > Michael Sync >> >> > >> > > > > > >> > Don't go the way life takes you. >> > >> > > > > > >> > Take life the way you go >> >> > >> > > > > > >> >http://michaelsync.net >> >> > >> > > > > > >> > On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 9:49 PM, Julian Birch < >> > >> > > [email protected] >> > >> > > > > > >wrote: >> >> > >> > > > > > >> >> Krzysztof has checked out the new SL build, and has >> > >> > > > > > >> >> identified >> > >> > > the >> > >> > > > > > >> >> following tasks once I've got my new machine: >> >> > >> > > > > > >> >> - Remove superfluous SLN/CSPROJ files (me) >> > >> > > > > > >> >> - Standardize naming. (-SL to -SL3, others???) (me) >> > >> > > > > > >> >> - Add cmd file to generate alternative projects. (me) >> > >> > > > > > >> >> - Get SL3 on CI server using msbuild integration >> > >> > > > > > >> >> (Krzysztof) >> >> > >> > > > > > >> >> Anything else anyone can think of before we switch over? >> >> > >> > > > > > >> >> J >> >> > >> > > > > > >> >> -- >> > >> > > > > > >> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to >> > >> > > > > > >> >> the >> > >> > > Google >> > >> > > > > > Groups >> > >> > > > > > >> >> "Castle Project Development List" group. >> > >> > > > > > >> >> To post to this group, send email to >> > >> > > > > > >> >> [email protected]. >> > >> > > > > > >> >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> > >> > > > > > >> >> [email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]> >> > >> > > <castle-project-devel%[email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]> >> >> > >> > > > > > <castle-project-devel%[email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]> >> > >> > > <castle-project-devel%[email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]> >> >> > >> > > > > > >> >> . >> > >> > > > > > >> >> For more options, visit this group at >> > >> > > > > > >> >>http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. >> >> > >> > > > > > >> > -- >> > >> > > > > > >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to >> > >> > > > > > >> > the >> > >> > > Google >> > >> > > > > > Groups >> > >> > > > > > >> > "Castle Project Development List" group. >> > >> > > > > > >> > To post to this group, send email to >> > >> > > > > > [email protected] >> > >> > > > > > >> > . >> > >> > > > > > >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> > >> > > > > > >> > [email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]> >> > >> > > <castle-project-devel%[email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]> >> >> > >> > > > > > <castle-project-devel%[email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]> >> > >> > > <castle-project-devel%[email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]> >> >> > >> > > > > > >> > . >> > >> > > > > > >> > For more options, visit this group at >> > >> > > > > > >> >http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. >> >> > >> > > > > > > -- >> > >> > > > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the >> > >> > > > > > > Google >> > >> > > Groups >> > >> > > > > > "Castle Project Development List" group. >> > >> > > > > > > To post to this group, send email to >> > >> > > > > > [email protected]. >> > >> > > > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> > >> > > > > > [email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]> >> > >> > > <castle-project-devel%[email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]> >> >> > >> > > > > > . >> > >> > > > > > > For more options, visit this group at >> > >> > > > > >http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. >> >> > >> > > > > > -- >> > >> > > > > > You received this message because you are >> >> ... >> >> read more >> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Castle Project Development List" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
