if we get a build agent with mono on windows. Why do mono builds fail on Linux btw? is that because of MsBuild?
W dniu 12 kwietnia 2010 23:20 użytkownik John Simons <[email protected]> napisał: > How about mono builds? > Which btw have been broken for the last 2 mths! > > I think mono builds would work fine if we do it in windows instead and > this way at least we have a mono build that works and we are able to > debug if required, thoughts? > > Cheers > John > > On Apr 12, 11:58 pm, Krzysztof Koźmic (2) <[email protected]> wrote: >> ok, as long as it works I don't really care. >> >> What about .NET 4 and SL 4 support. Can we start doing builds for >> these please? >> And can we fix SL3 build (migrate it to multitargetting if needed). >> >> Do all committers have access to VS2010? >> For the beginning there should be 90days trial available so that we >> get 3 months before we upgrade. >> >> Krzysztof >> >> On 12 Kwi, 15:33, Roelof Blom <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > Yes, you can make assembly references conditional. It looks a bit weird in >> > the VSNET UI though, you'll have multiple occurences of the same assembly >> > in >> > the references list, with a small yellow exclamation mark next to it. >> > It works correctly though. >> >> > Here's some good info on it:http://goo.gl/JzFRhttp://goo.gl/oCyZ >> >> > -- Roelof. >> >> > 2010/4/12 Krzysztof Ko 1/4 mic (2) <[email protected]> >> >> > > would multitargetting be able to pick up different versions of >> > > dependencies from different subfolders? >> >> > > like: >> > > ..\tools\net-35\nunit.dll >> > > ..\tools\sl-30\nunit.dll >> >> > > On 12 Kwi, 10:16, John Simons <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > > Roelof, >> >> > > > My wish is satisfied with MSBuild multitargetting :) >> > > > Very nice read: >> > >http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee395432%28v=VS.100%29.aspx >> >> > > > My only concern is that if we go down this path, we basically saying >> > > > that we only support VS2010 from now on, which btw is not a problem >> > > > for me ;) >> >> > > > Cheers >> > > > John >> >> > > > On Apr 12, 6:02 pm, Roelof Blom <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > > > > I could be way off, but IMHO the multi-targeting support in MSBuild >> > > > > 4.0 >> > > is >> > > > > able create binaries for different platforms from a single set of >> > > project >> > > > > files. >> >> > > > > So contrary to John's wish I would love to see only one solution for >> > > each >> > > > > project. More sln/csproj means more work, even if using a tool, and >> > > > > it >> > > will >> > > > > clutter the root folder of each project even more than today. >> >> > > > > On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 8:20 AM, Julian Birch <[email protected] >> > > >wrote: >> >> > > > > > It's basically the same as the assemblyinfo.cs issue: we exclude >> > > > > > because it would complicate source control. The only problem is, >> > > > > > Roelof's code to auto-generate them relies on there being a >> > > > > > solution >> > > > > > in the first place, which doesn't apply in this case. >> >> > > > > > I would love it if we could come up with a better solution to this >> > > > > > problem. But at the moment all I can think of as an alternative is >> > > > > > complex check-ins which keep all the solutions up to date. And >> > > > > > then >> > > > > > you get problems if someone modifies two solutions in different >> > > > > > ways... >> >> > > > > > J >> >> > > > > > On Sunday, April 11, 2010, John Simons <[email protected]> >> > > wrote: >> > > > > > > Julian, >> >> > > > > > > What do you mean by "-SL3 and other solutions are generated by >> > > > > > > the >> > > > > > > build" ? >> >> > > > > > > Regarding solution + project files, I would like to see all our >> > > > > > > projects to have a solution and project files for: >> > > > > > > - VS2008 >> > > > > > > - VS2010 >> > > > > > > - VS2010 + SL4 >> > > > > > > - VS2008 + SL3 >> >> > > > > > > This makes it easier for anyone to pop the solution open and work >> > > on >> > > > > > > it. >> > > > > > > No "run this before" or "sorry we don't have that"! >> >> > > > > > > Cheers >> > > > > > > John >> >> > > > > > > On Apr 12, 1:15 am, Julian Birch <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > > > > >> Hi, sorry to make it more clear: >> >> > > > > > >> - We keep a master sln and csproj file (maybe two) called >> > > -vs2008 or >> > > > > > >> -vs2010. >> > > > > > >> - -SL3 and other solutions are generated by the build. >> >> > > > > > >> That's basically how Solution Transform works: have a master >> > > project and >> > > > > > all >> > > > > > >> the others are generated from it. This keeps synchronization >> > > costs to a >> > > > > > >> minimum. >> >> > > > > > >> As far as your moq problems go, though, I think you may need to >> > > approach >> > > > > > it >> > > > > > >> a different way. Is it possible to run WP7 code hosted within >> > > ordinary >> > > > > > .NET >> > > > > > >> code? That'd solve the problem (ish). >> >> > > > > > >> J >> >> > > > > > >> On 11 April 2010 16:04, Michael Sync <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > > > > > >> > Hi Julian, >> >> > > > > > >> > Why do you want to remove sln and csproj files? How shall we >> > > open the >> > > > > > >> > project in Visual Studio? >> >> > > > > > >> > >>Add cmd file to generate alternative projects. >> >> > > > > > >> > I'm not very sure on this. What kind of projects that you want >> > > to >> > > > > > generate >> > > > > > >> > from console? >> >> > > > > > >> > Thanks and Best Regards, >> > > > > > >> > Michael Sync >> >> > > > > > >> > Don't go the way life takes you. >> > > > > > >> > Take life the way you go >> >> > > > > > >> >http://michaelsync.net >> >> > > > > > >> > On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 9:49 PM, Julian Birch < >> > > [email protected] >> > > > > > >wrote: >> >> > > > > > >> >> Krzysztof has checked out the new SL build, and has >> > > > > > >> >> identified >> > > the >> > > > > > >> >> following tasks once I've got my new machine: >> >> > > > > > >> >> - Remove superfluous SLN/CSPROJ files (me) >> > > > > > >> >> - Standardize naming. (-SL to -SL3, others???) (me) >> > > > > > >> >> - Add cmd file to generate alternative projects. (me) >> > > > > > >> >> - Get SL3 on CI server using msbuild integration >> > > > > > >> >> (Krzysztof) >> >> > > > > > >> >> Anything else anyone can think of before we switch over? >> >> > > > > > >> >> J >> >> > > > > > >> >> -- >> > > > > > >> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the >> > > Google >> > > > > > Groups >> > > > > > >> >> "Castle Project Development List" group. >> > > > > > >> >> To post to this group, send email to >> > > > > > >> >> [email protected]. >> > > > > > >> >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> > > > > > >> >> [email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]> >> > > <castle-project-devel%[email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]> >> >> > > > > > <castle-project-devel%[email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]> >> > > <castle-project-devel%[email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]> >> >> > > > > > >> >> . >> > > > > > >> >> For more options, visit this group at >> > > > > > >> >>http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. >> >> > > > > > >> > -- >> > > > > > >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the >> > > Google >> > > > > > Groups >> > > > > > >> > "Castle Project Development List" group. >> > > > > > >> > To post to this group, send email to >> > > > > > [email protected] >> > > > > > >> > . >> > > > > > >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> > > > > > >> > [email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]> >> > > <castle-project-devel%[email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]> >> >> > > > > > <castle-project-devel%[email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]> >> > > <castle-project-devel%[email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]> >> >> > > > > > >> > . >> > > > > > >> > For more options, visit this group at >> > > > > > >> >http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. >> >> > > > > > > -- >> > > > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the >> > > > > > > Google >> > > Groups >> > > > > > "Castle Project Development List" group. >> > > > > > > To post to this group, send email to >> > > > > > [email protected]. >> > > > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> > > > > > [email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]> >> > > <castle-project-devel%[email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]> >> >> > > > > > . >> > > > > > > For more options, visit this group at >> > > > > >http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. >> >> > > > > > -- >> > > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> > > Groups >> > > > > > "Castle Project Development List" group. >> > > > > > To post to this group, send email to >> > > [email protected] >> > > > > > . >> > > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> > > > > > [email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]> >> > > <castle-project-devel%[email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]> >> >> > > > > > . >> > > > > > For more options, visit this group at >> > > > > >http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. >> >> > > -- >> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> > > "Castle Project Development List" group. >> > > To post to this group, send email to >> > > [email protected] >> > > . >> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> > > [email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]> >> > > . >> > > For more options, visit this group at >> > >http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Castle Project Development List" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
