Any return from Jetbrains? as from Mono's part it is already fixed: see http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg31464.html
Rafael "Monoman" Teixeira --------------------------------------- "To be creative means to be in love with life. You can be creative only if you love life enough that you want to enhance its beauty, you want to bring a little more music to it, a little more poetry to it, a little more dance to it." Osho 2010/4/12 Henry Conceição <[email protected]>: > About mono and xbuild: > http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel/msg/6d10135332287a32 > > Cheers, > Henry Conceição > > > > 2010/4/12 John Simons <[email protected]>: >> Here is the error we getting: >> http://builds.castleproject.org/viewLog.html?tab=buildLog&buildTypeId=bt21&buildId=5371 >> when trying to use xbuild. >> >> There seems to be also a lot of projects still configured to build >> with nant for mono + svn! >> >> Cheers >> John >> >> On Apr 13, 8:50 am, John Simons <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Right now the reason builds are failing is because the agent is >>> disconnected:http://builds.castleproject.org/agents.html?unregistered=true >>> But before that i think it was because we are not using nant and >>> instead are using msbuild. >>> >>> > if we get a build agent with mono on windows. >>> >>> What's wrong with using the build agent we already have for .net3.5? >>> All we have to do is install mono for windows on that machine :) >>> >>> Cheers >>> John >>> >>> On Apr 13, 8:07 am, Krzysztof Koźmic <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> > if we get a build agent with mono on windows. >>> >>> > Why do mono builds fail on Linux btw? >>> > is that because of MsBuild? >>> >>> > W dniu 12 kwietnia 2010 23:20 użytkownik John Simons >>> > <[email protected]> napisał: >>> >>> > > How about mono builds? >>> > > Which btw have been broken for the last 2 mths! >>> >>> > > I think mono builds would work fine if we do it in windows instead and >>> > > this way at least we have a mono build that works and we are able to >>> > > debug if required, thoughts? >>> >>> > > Cheers >>> > > John >>> >>> > > On Apr 12, 11:58 pm, Krzysztof Koźmic (2) <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > >> ok, as long as it works I don't really care. >>> >>> > >> What about .NET 4 and SL 4 support. Can we start doing builds for >>> > >> these please? >>> > >> And can we fix SL3 build (migrate it to multitargetting if needed). >>> >>> > >> Do all committers have access to VS2010? >>> > >> For the beginning there should be 90days trial available so that we >>> > >> get 3 months before we upgrade. >>> >>> > >> Krzysztof >>> >>> > >> On 12 Kwi, 15:33, Roelof Blom <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> > >> > Yes, you can make assembly references conditional. It looks a bit >>> > >> > weird in >>> > >> > the VSNET UI though, you'll have multiple occurences of the same >>> > >> > assembly in >>> > >> > the references list, with a small yellow exclamation mark next to it. >>> > >> > It works correctly though. >>> >>> > >> > Here's some good info on it:http://goo.gl/JzFRhttp://goo.gl/oCyZ >>> >>> > >> > -- Roelof. >>> >>> > >> > 2010/4/12 Krzysztof Ko 1/4 mic (2) <[email protected]> >>> >>> > >> > > would multitargetting be able to pick up different versions of >>> > >> > > dependencies from different subfolders? >>> >>> > >> > > like: >>> > >> > > ..\tools\net-35\nunit.dll >>> > >> > > ..\tools\sl-30\nunit.dll >>> >>> > >> > > On 12 Kwi, 10:16, John Simons <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > >> > > > Roelof, >>> >>> > >> > > > My wish is satisfied with MSBuild multitargetting :) >>> > >> > > > Very nice read: >>> > >> > >http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee395432%28v=VS.100%29.aspx >>> >>> > >> > > > My only concern is that if we go down this path, we basically >>> > >> > > > saying >>> > >> > > > that we only support VS2010 from now on, which btw is not a >>> > >> > > > problem >>> > >> > > > for me ;) >>> >>> > >> > > > Cheers >>> > >> > > > John >>> >>> > >> > > > On Apr 12, 6:02 pm, Roelof Blom <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> > >> > > > > I could be way off, but IMHO the multi-targeting support in >>> > >> > > > > MSBuild 4.0 >>> > >> > > is >>> > >> > > > > able create binaries for different platforms from a single set >>> > >> > > > > of >>> > >> > > project >>> > >> > > > > files. >>> >>> > >> > > > > So contrary to John's wish I would love to see only one >>> > >> > > > > solution for >>> > >> > > each >>> > >> > > > > project. More sln/csproj means more work, even if using a >>> > >> > > > > tool, and it >>> > >> > > will >>> > >> > > > > clutter the root folder of each project even more than today. >>> >>> > >> > > > > On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 8:20 AM, Julian Birch >>> > >> > > > > <[email protected] >>> > >> > > >wrote: >>> >>> > >> > > > > > It's basically the same as the assemblyinfo.cs issue: we >>> > >> > > > > > exclude >>> > >> > > > > > because it would complicate source control. The only >>> > >> > > > > > problem is, >>> > >> > > > > > Roelof's code to auto-generate them relies on there being a >>> > >> > > > > > solution >>> > >> > > > > > in the first place, which doesn't apply in this case. >>> >>> > >> > > > > > I would love it if we could come up with a better solution >>> > >> > > > > > to this >>> > >> > > > > > problem. But at the moment all I can think of as an >>> > >> > > > > > alternative is >>> > >> > > > > > complex check-ins which keep all the solutions up to date. >>> > >> > > > > > And then >>> > >> > > > > > you get problems if someone modifies two solutions in >>> > >> > > > > > different >>> > >> > > > > > ways... >>> >>> > >> > > > > > J >>> >>> > >> > > > > > On Sunday, April 11, 2010, John Simons >>> > >> > > > > > <[email protected]> >>> > >> > > wrote: >>> > >> > > > > > > Julian, >>> >>> > >> > > > > > > What do you mean by "-SL3 and other solutions are >>> > >> > > > > > > generated by the >>> > >> > > > > > > build" ? >>> >>> > >> > > > > > > Regarding solution + project files, I would like to see >>> > >> > > > > > > all our >>> > >> > > > > > > projects to have a solution and project files for: >>> > >> > > > > > > - VS2008 >>> > >> > > > > > > - VS2010 >>> > >> > > > > > > - VS2010 + SL4 >>> > >> > > > > > > - VS2008 + SL3 >>> >>> > >> > > > > > > This makes it easier for anyone to pop the solution open >>> > >> > > > > > > and work >>> > >> > > on >>> > >> > > > > > > it. >>> > >> > > > > > > No "run this before" or "sorry we don't have that"! >>> >>> > >> > > > > > > Cheers >>> > >> > > > > > > John >>> >>> > >> > > > > > > On Apr 12, 1:15 am, Julian Birch <[email protected]> >>> > >> > > > > > > wrote: >>> > >> > > > > > >> Hi, sorry to make it more clear: >>> >>> > >> > > > > > >> - We keep a master sln and csproj file (maybe two) >>> > >> > > > > > >> called >>> > >> > > -vs2008 or >>> > >> > > > > > >> -vs2010. >>> > >> > > > > > >> - -SL3 and other solutions are generated by the build. >>> >>> > >> > > > > > >> That's basically how Solution Transform works: have a >>> > >> > > > > > >> master >>> > >> > > project and >>> > >> > > > > > all >>> > >> > > > > > >> the others are generated from it. This keeps >>> > >> > > > > > >> synchronization >>> > >> > > costs to a >>> > >> > > > > > >> minimum. >>> >>> > >> > > > > > >> As far as your moq problems go, though, I think you may >>> > >> > > > > > >> need to >>> > >> > > approach >>> > >> > > > > > it >>> > >> > > > > > >> a different way. Is it possible to run WP7 code hosted >>> > >> > > > > > >> within >>> > >> > > ordinary >>> > >> > > > > > .NET >>> > >> > > > > > >> code? That'd solve the problem (ish). >>> >>> > >> > > > > > >> J >>> >>> > >> > > > > > >> On 11 April 2010 16:04, Michael Sync <[email protected]> >>> > >> > > > > > >> wrote: >>> >>> > >> > > > > > >> > Hi Julian, >>> >>> > >> > > > > > >> > Why do you want to remove sln and csproj files? How >>> > >> > > > > > >> > shall we >>> > >> > > open the >>> > >> > > > > > >> > project in Visual Studio? >>> >>> > >> > > > > > >> > >>Add cmd file to generate alternative projects. >>> >>> > >> > > > > > >> > I'm not very sure on this. What kind of projects that >>> > >> > > > > > >> > you want >>> > >> > > to >>> > >> > > > > > generate >>> > >> > > > > > >> > from console? >>> >>> > >> > > > > > >> > Thanks and Best Regards, >>> > >> > > > > > >> > Michael Sync >>> >>> > >> > > > > > >> > Don't go the way life takes you. >>> > >> > > > > > >> > Take life the way you go >>> >>> > >> > > > > > >> >http://michaelsync.net >>> >>> > >> > > > > > >> > On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 9:49 PM, Julian Birch < >>> > >> > > [email protected] >>> > >> > > > > > >wrote: >>> >>> > >> > > > > > >> >> Krzysztof has checked out the new SL build, and has >>> > >> > > > > > >> >> identified >>> > >> > > the >>> > >> > > > > > >> >> following tasks once I've got my new machine: >>> >>> > >> > > > > > >> >> - Remove superfluous SLN/CSPROJ files (me) >>> > >> > > > > > >> >> - Standardize naming. (-SL to -SL3, others???) (me) >>> > >> > > > > > >> >> - Add cmd file to generate alternative projects. >>> > >> > > > > > >> >> (me) >>> > >> > > > > > >> >> - Get SL3 on CI server using msbuild integration >>> > >> > > > > > >> >> (Krzysztof) >>> >>> > >> > > > > > >> >> Anything else anyone can think of before we switch >>> > >> > > > > > >> >> over? >>> >>> > >> > > > > > >> >> J >>> >>> > >> > > > > > >> >> -- >>> > >> > > > > > >> >> You received this message because you are subscribed >>> > >> > > > > > >> >> to the >>> > >> > > Google >>> > >> > > > > > Groups >>> > >> > > > > > >> >> "Castle Project Development List" group. >>> > >> > > > > > >> >> To post to this group, send email to >>> > >> > > > > > >> >> [email protected]. >>> > >> > > > > > >> >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> > >> > > > > > >> >> [email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]> >>> > >> > > <castle-project-devel%[email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]> >>> >>> > >> > > > > > <castle-project-devel%[email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]> >>> > >> > > <castle-project-devel%[email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]> >>> >>> > >> > > > > > >> >> . >>> > >> > > > > > >> >> For more options, visit this group at >>> > >> > > > > > >> >>http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. >>> >>> > >> > > > > > >> > -- >>> > >> > > > > > >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to >>> > >> > > > > > >> > the >>> > >> > > Google >>> > >> > > > > > Groups >>> > >> > > > > > >> > "Castle Project Development List" group. >>> > >> > > > > > >> > To post to this group, send email to >>> > >> > > > > > [email protected] >>> > >> > > > > > >> > . >>> > >> > > > > > >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> > >> > > > > > >> > [email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]> >>> > >> > > <castle-project-devel%[email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]> >>> >>> > >> > > > > > <castle-project-devel%[email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]> >>> > >> > > <castle-project-devel%[email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]> >>> >>> > >> > > > > > >> > . >>> > >> > > > > > >> > For more options, visit this group at >>> > >> > > > > > >> >http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. >>> >>> > >> > > > > > > -- >>> > >> > > > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to >>> > >> > > > > > > the Google >>> > >> > > Groups >>> > >> > > > > > "Castle Project Development List" group. >>> > >> > > > > > > To post to this group, send email to >>> > >> > > > > > [email protected]. >>> > >> > > > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> > >> > > > > > [email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]> >>> > >> > > <castle-project-devel%[email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]> >>> >>> > >> > > > > > . >>> > >> > > > > > > For more options, visit this group at >>> > >> > > > > >http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. >>> >>> > >> > > > > > -- >>> > >> > > > > > You received this message because you are >>> >>> ... >>> >>> read more >> >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Castle Project Development List" group. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. >> >> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Castle Project Development List" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
