On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 5:44 AM, Lorn <l...@lornlab.org> wrote: > I'm not following the thread but, did you guys know about > http://wiki.nginx.org/HttpUploadProgressModule. ? >
PerlBal (as in this old post: http://lists.danga.com/pipermail/perlbal/2005-November/000138.html ) can do this as well. I wonder about the topology. We used to run with Perlbal (and heartbeat and IP failover) in front of a pool of web servers. We now run with hardware load balancers in front of a pool of web servers. The load balancer does make it easy to adjust the pool -- as well as gracefully handle a web server dropping out of the pool. I don't want to add yet another set of servers for an extra proxy layer. So, I'm currently thinking of running Nginx on each web server. (Keep-alive between the load balancer and Nginx, and no keep-alive between Nginx and Catalyst with maybe Starman.) Anyone see why this might be a bad (or good) approach? -- Bill Moseley mose...@hank.org
_______________________________________________ List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk/ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
