Because I am not able to understand everything in the details I continued the method of comparative swap and I finally found the guilty:

It was Q13 !

I have temporarily replaced the 2N6471 by an approaching equivalent, I makes the settings to get very exactly + 5V on both outputs and the machine restarted, finally! YES !! :-)

But it would have been too easy if everything was in order at once. Well, the disk that started up before this power failure does not boot anymore. During the first restart I had on the terminal the messages "Warms in progress 01" then 02, 03 !! 04 !!! 05 !!!!!! And then ... nothing, and since it got worse, it did not pass the stage 02. Now it crashes from the beginning, nothing on the screen. Is my disk pack damaged? :-/

As I have two other disks, I attempted a re-installation from a magnetic tape on a blank disc (in fact old RL-02 with not important data), but it does not seem to hang data from the magnetic tapes , nothing is happening.

Another important detail was that during the first boot (partially successful) the lamp "disk not ready" was still on. However the computer attempted to boot. I then cleaned the head and the disk with isopropylic alcohol, no change, in short, the adventure continues ;-)

I will do a complete check tomorrow at level of connectors, I have so much tinkered ... Otherwise it brings me back to the question I have been asking yet myself : what operating system will I choose and how will I copy it on a bootable 9 track tape ?. I have a vax 4000-605A and a TU81 +, otherwise I also have a nine track tape scsi from an HP server, remains to know if I can use it as a standard SCSI device or if I have to do modifications?

My biggest fears are: An electronic problem on the Diablo Model 40 Disk Pack, a problem with the head. A problem on the Mag-tape Pertec 8840A, I have never seen it work.

But for the Diablo I think for a disk problem, it almost succeeded its boot just after the repair, I'm just disappointed to observe a degradation in the results.

Nevertheless two small photos of the resuscitation ;-)

http://www.zeltrax.com/classiccmp_forum/reanimator01.jpg <http://www.zeltrax.com/classiccmp_forum/reanimator01.jpg>

http://www.zeltrax.com/classiccmp_forum/reanimator02.jpg

Thanks a lot for your help and assistance !

Dominique

On 26/08/2017 00:03, Brent Hilpert wrote:
On 2017-Aug-25, at 3:23 AM, Dominique Carlier wrote:
Thank you Marc, I will follow your advice. Doubts must be removed. I would be 
glad to know that the big (and expensive) capacitors are OK.

In the meantime I have new information. Following the remarks of Brent Hilpert 
I sought to have more information on the backplane of my D116-E. I always 
assumed that the information in the manuals did not match my version of 
backplane because of this:
http://www.zeltrax.com/classiccmp_forum/backplane/01.jpg

The boards are placed to another slots in the documentation. I put this on the 
accounts of the many revisions but also the fact that the computer has been 
distributed by Nixdorf and they probably assembled the elements, and made the 
setup of the backplane with the wires. Regardless of the configuration of the 
slots, the wires setup, the associated external connectors, at the level of 
power supply finally I thinks that should be the same situation on my D116 as 
on another.
In digging into the second manual which does not contain the schematics I found 
this precious diagram:
http://www.zeltrax.com/classiccmp_forum/backplane/diagram.jpg

I discovered that the common point that brings together the boards causing the 
Power Fail (HDD controller / Tape controller / Scanner) is the fact that they 
are in the slots from 8 to 12 which are powered by the regulated +5V of the 
circuit A2.
http://www.zeltrax.com/classiccmp_forum/backplane/diagram2.jpg

In other words, the circuit + 5V A2 of the power supply G2 serves only to power 
the boards in the slots from 8 to 12 which cause a power fail if only one of 
these slots is populated with one of the boards.

What I don't understood yet is why it's on the pins of A1 (10-14 / 36-40) that 
I measure a drop of tension?
http://www.zeltrax.com/classiccmp_forum/backplane/pins_a1.jpg

Because A2 is on the pins 15-22 / 41-48
http://www.zeltrax.com/classiccmp_forum/backplane/diagram_a2.jpg

I will re-read the operation of the Power Fail, maybe it supposed to clamp A1 
even in case of problem on A2 ?
Or I don't understood all the intricacies about the power supply of these 
antique boards ^^

Anyway I'll do the tests you suggest Marc, it sounds good to have confirmation 
that the basic level are working well before going any further.

Very good that you found that power distribution diagram.
Regarding the A1 vs A2 anomaly, it seems more likely there's just some 
discrepancy between the machine and the manual.
Perhaps they swapped the power supply feeds when they reorganised the board 
order.
The POWER FAIL sensing is not symmetric between the two regulators, they may 
have swapped the supplies so the sensing followed with the big-IO boards.
Or the documentation may just be incorrect.

Alternatively, the supplies do share the tertiary +34V supply (and the 
transformer input), but interaction here seems less likely (not to rule 
anything out).

This regulator-to-slots wiring should be sorted out/confirmed with some 
checking.

The theory-of-op page you supplied from the manual mentions a paragraph 6-3 
that may describe the power fail circuit, but it's not on that page.
As you mentioned way back that the power fail was being asserted, it might be 
helpful to see that paragraph.


 From earlier:
A minor comment regarding the components in the power supply: Q13 is a stage in 
the regulator drivers and as consequential as other components such as Q2.
Do you think that Q12 (linked to defective A1 / + 5v) could be the culprit?
Yes, it could be.
If that transistor were open/faulty, the pass transistors would still be 
getting some drive current through the BE resistor and perhaps the BE junction 
but not getting the current gain the transistor is supposed to provide.
At low load current, the output V would be fine as the drive is adequate to 
maintain control of the pass transistors, but as the load current increases the 
pass transistors would saturate (not be able to pass more current) relative to 
the (now inadequate) drive current, and the output voltage would drop.
Bipolar transistors are current amplifiers, there is a direct limiting relation 
between the drive current through the base and what can be drawn through the 
collector.

Of course, whether it is the culprit is another question.
You could do simple junction tests on it.

  A more analytical approach would be a good idea to broadly sort out the fault 
area:
                1. the input/raw supply.
                        - low average voltage taking the input V below the 
dropout / headroom level for the regulator,
                        - excessive ripple taking the input V below the dropout 
level.

                2. the regulator.
                        - loss of gain,
                        - unduly going into current limiting.

                3. faulty load(s) sending the supply into (designed) current 
limiting.

Now that we know something about the power distribution, 3 seems less likely.

Marc's tests would be very helpful.




On 25/08/2017 06:43, Curious Marc wrote:
Dominique,
I wouldn't worry about the readings on your 0.1 Ohm resistor, you are not going 
to get any trustable results on something that low without a four wire 
ohm-meter.
It seems that you have eliminated the power transistors as being the source of 
the failure.
I'd like to eliminate the rectifier diodes or the big caps as the source of the 
problem
1-        Could you please measure and compare (or better get a scope trace) of 
the voltage at the F3 and F2 fuses when the voltage drops. If the voltage also 
drops at the fuse (pre-regulation) then either your caps/diode combo is not 
good, or your boards are drawing too much current.
2-       If that's the case, you could also easily swap the power source for 
the two regulators. Temporarily lifting both fuses on the output side , and 
cross wire F2 to feed A2 and F3 to feed A1. If the fault moves, that would 
strongly  indicate that one of the cap/diode combo is bad. If it does not, then 
either the regulation circuitry is bad or the boards draw an anomalous amount 
of power.
3-       Measure how much each board is pulling (as far as amps). You can do 
this easily by removing the fuse and putting an ammeter in its place, then plug 
each board one at a time, and read what the amperage is.
4-       Do a similar measurement adding boards one by one and see at which 
amperage the voltage starts to degrade, and if it exceeds the design criterion 
for the power supply.
Marc
From: cctalk <cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org> on behalf of "cctalk@classiccmp.org" <cctalk@classiccmp.org>
Reply-To: Dominique Carlier <d...@skynet.be>, "cctalk@classiccmp.org" 
<cctalk@classiccmp.org>
Date: Wednesday, August 23, 2017 at 6:17 AM
To: "cctalk@classiccmp.org" <cctalk@classiccmp.org>
Subject: Re: DCC-116 E / DATA GENERAL NOVA 2/10 / Nixdorf 620 - Restoring and 
restarting
Here is the situation. The + 5V 12A that collapses comes out from pins 10-14 / 36-40, the other
+ 5V 12A (pins 15-22 / 36-40) never goes down.
All that I surrounded in green on that image (1950×2361, zoomable) are
the components that I tested on the power supply G2, A3 motherboard,
regulation board and heatsink A1 + A2:
http://www.zeltrax.com/classiccmp_forum/psu_g2_test/g2_tested_components.jpg
To eliminate some doubts and because I do not have some spare parts on
hand, I switched the modules A1 and A2, same result. Idem with the
transistors 2N2905, same result.
The result is always the same : it's always the +5V on pins 10-14 /
36-40 that collapses, never the other output.
Some resistors are not yet tested is because these must be de-soldered
for a valid test, but the printed circuit is very fragile and many
component have legs bent into the weld.
Except for the not tested components (among others the LM376, the
rectifier diodes) At this stage I start again to suspect a little
everything. The famous large capacitors of the power supply (C1 to C4).
But also a possible problems on the boards of the computer itself.
As one of you mentioned, the hypothesis of shorted decoupling capacitors
on the boards could put the power supply in default.
Note that the machine runs normally with the CPU board, three core
memory boards (400w each) + two multiplexing boards for terminals + the
printer board.
If I add only one of these remaining board:
- Disk Pack Controller
- 9-track tape Controller
- "scanner" board (also for terminals)
-> Power Fail. Note that : if I only connect the CPU and the disk pack controller card:
Power Fail too !!
What makes me doubtful about this scenario is that I can not imagine
that these three boards, each causing the Power Fail, could fail
simultaneously. Remember that the first time I powered up the beast (one
big hour), the machine was working with all the boards and Power Fail
appeared at once.
I have not retested since but also note that by adding an external power
supply just for the deficient + 5V , the machine has restarted and even
booted the operating system.
If you have another ideas? LM376? Thanks Dominique On 20/08/2017 09:08, Brent Hilpert wrote:
On 2017-Aug-19, at 12:10 PM, Dominique Carlier via cctalk wrote:
Maybe it's better to give us all the useful information these power supplies, 
moreover it might be useful to other people with the same computer.
An overall bloc diagram of the D-116 power supply including G1 and G2.
http://www.zeltrax.com/classiccmp_forum/psu_overall_bloc_diagram.jpg
The complete schematics of the part of the power supply named G2.
http://www.zeltrax.com/classiccmp_forum/g2_schematics.jpg
A drawing of the regulation board of the power supply G2 with the physical locations of the components.
http://www.zeltrax.com/classiccmp_forum/g2_regulator_board.jpg
The schematics of this regulation board.
http://www.zeltrax.com/classiccmp_forum/g2_regulator_board_schematics.jpg
And a bit of literature concerning the principle of operation about the regulation with this PSU (you will understand better why I am a little bit lost ;-) This principle of regulation with a panoply of verification and Protection systems everywhere is unusual for me)
http://www.zeltrax.com/classiccmp_forum/psu_regulation_principe.jpg
I have already tried without the CPU board: same symptoms. Next step, try to check the capacitors in operation. Results of the observations:
- This is definitely the regulated +5V of the G2 power supply. More I add 
boards more the + 5v level goes down. +5v, +4.8v, +3.6v, +2.9v. It remains 
stable however with just the CPU and the three core memory boards, it becomes 
difficult for the power supply when I add boards in addition to these.
- This is definitely not a problem at the level of the Power Fail circuit.
- The big capacitors are not in fault (I rechecked twice).
- So this maybe a problem at the level of the regulation itself, the +5V 
balancing system ?
Question: a faulty voltage regulator can behave in this way? I always thought it worked or it did not work, but not between the two states depending on the charge.
(In answer to the question, yes, a faulty regulator can produce 'in-between' 
output voltage.)
As is typical for power supplies of this type and era, this power supply includes current limiting circuitry. The current-limiting circuitry will throttle down the output voltage (not shut it off completely) as the output current draw goes above a design limit.
This would appear to fit the symptoms you describe.
The current-limiting circuitry works by placing a small-value resistor in the current path after the main regulator transistor(s) (aka pass transistors) but prior to the voltage-regulation sense point.
A transistor senses the voltage across this R.
As the output current increases, the voltage across the current-sense R 
increases, at some point the transistor starts to turn on, and the transistor 
is connected in such a way that as it turns on it reduces the drive to the pass 
transistors, throttling down the output voltage.
Arbitrarily using the "A2" heatsink half of the two +5 supplies in this power supply for component references, the current-sense R is comprised of a series-parallel circuit formed by the BE junctions of the 2 pass transistors (A2.Q1, A2.Q2), the two 0.1ohm Rs on the emitters of the pass transistors (A3.R10,A3.R11), the 47ohm Rs between B&E of those transistors, A3.R23, A3A1A1.R8, 376.R9, along with additional influence by 376.R8 and A3A1A1.R10.
The current sense transistor is inside the LM376 (see internal schematic), 376.Q16 
between pins 1 & 8, controlling the 1st-stage driver transistor 376.Q14.
There are various things that could go wrong on this circuitry.
Anything that upsets the current-sense resistance network to cause the net R to 
increase will lower the output current that can be drawn (that is, the current 
limiting circuitry will start kicking in too 'early').
A likely scenario is one of the pass transistors has failed open.
This would take out a parallel leg of the current-sense resistance.
All current would  be forced through the good pass transistor and it's emitter 
resistor, raising the current-sense voltage for a given output current.
The current-limiting circuitry would kick in at a lower current than the design 
intention.
This is beneficial inasmuch as it would work to save the good pass transistor.
The 0.1 ohm 9W emitter resistors are critical, although they're probably wirewound and fairly reliable unless quite overstressed.
One of these resistors being open would result in the same operation as an open 
pass transistor.
You'll have difficulty measuring them with accuracy but you could do some 
sanity checks for continuity around both the pass transistor circuit legs,
as well as checking the pass transistor BC/BE junctions.
(In principle, the 'proper' thing to do in this area is look at what the current-sense voltage is doing, but that requires knowing what the target V is. Could compare with the other half of the supply.) None of this is to suggest this area is necessarily at fault, or rule out other areas of the supply. Another possible fault that would fit the symptom (decreasing voltage as current draw increases, if that's what's going on) is inadequate (partially failed) drive to the pass transistors.
In short, anything reducing the power gain of the regulator error amplifier 
could produce this symptom.


Reply via email to