See below...
On 25/06/2007 4:32 p.m., Andrew Miller wrote:
James Lawson wrote:
Andrew Miller wrote:
I don't think we should use the word 'project team' because there is no
formal project team. Perhaps we can just have a list of people
categorised by their interest in the CellML project, and then a contact
page which helps people find certain people (for example, we could have
a category for technical issues with cellml.org, which would list Tommy,
a category for people with the ability to curate cardiac
electrophysiology models, which would list James, and a category for
people with an interest in cardiac electrophysiological modelling, which
would list anyone who wanted to be on the list).
There is then the issue of whether we use our own email
addresses or @cellml.org addresses. Andre is keen on the latter, and I
agree.
Although I am not entirely convinced that it is necessary or beneficial,
and I think that we risk harming the community nature of CellML by
saying that only certain people can get a cellml.org e-mail address.
Surely there's no harm in having a small number of generic @cellml.org
email addresses that reflect the roles people play? (eg
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]). I don't
think it's a good idea to have lots of these addresses (as this can get
confusing), nor should the roles be too specialised.
Regards,
Dave
_______________________________________________
cellml-discussion mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.cellml.org/mailman/listinfo/cellml-discussion
