On 6/25/07, David Nickerson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Matt wrote: > > This seems like it's going in circles. I'm not really sure why anyone > > would want to contact us personally with something they didn't want to > > send to the list. Thinking about this more we should probably try: > > > > 1) [email protected] > > > > 2) [EMAIL PROTECTED] - for specific enquiries that you don't want > > publicly available. It would make sense to have a nominated person or > > persons that address mail in there - James I would think - who decides > > if an email should be forwarded to the list because it really is a > > public issue - or respond and acknowledge the email and seek a > > response from those in the team that it seems appropriate to. > > for all the same reasons why we dropped [EMAIL PROTECTED], I can't see > this being a good idea.
Right. But I don't see any other resolution given the current circles. I think 'team' is a little more focussed than 'info'. I just vote to give it a try with James managing it actively and see how it goes. > > > 3) a team page where everyone who is on the team-cellml list has a > > picture and a small blurb (kind of like http://sbml.org/contacts/) ... > > which is really just to give a face to those who are quite deeply > > involved. I would imagine people like Penny Noble to be on that. If > > someone contacts someone on that page then it will likely be quite > > personal. > > this is exactly what we were originally discussing and the SBML page is > what I thought we'd be working the cellml.org/team page into. good > _______________________________________________ > cellml-discussion mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.cellml.org/mailman/listinfo/cellml-discussion > _______________________________________________ cellml-discussion mailing list [email protected] http://www.cellml.org/mailman/listinfo/cellml-discussion
