On 6/26/07, James Lawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > David Nickerson wrote: > > Matt wrote: > >> This seems like it's going in circles. I'm not really sure why anyone > >> would want to contact us personally with something they didn't want to > >> send to the list. Thinking about this more we should probably try: > >> > >> 1) [email protected] > >> > >> 2) [EMAIL PROTECTED] - for specific enquiries that you don't want > >> publicly available. It would make sense to have a nominated person or > >> persons that address mail in there - James I would think - who decides > >> if an email should be forwarded to the list because it really is a > >> public issue - or respond and acknowledge the email and seek a > >> response from those in the team that it seems appropriate to. > > > > for all the same reasons why we dropped [EMAIL PROTECTED], I can't see > > this being a good idea. > > > >> 3) a team page where everyone who is on the team-cellml list has a > >> picture and a small blurb (kind of like http://sbml.org/contacts/) ... > >> which is really just to give a face to those who are quite deeply > >> involved. I would imagine people like Penny Noble to be on that. If > >> someone contacts someone on that page then it will likely be quite > >> personal. > > > > this is exactly what we were originally discussing and the SBML page is > > what I thought we'd be working the cellml.org/team page into. > > Yes this is exactly what Peter and I were originally talking about. > That, along with a prominent link to the discussion group explaining > what it can be used for. The only issue is whether to: > 1.) put up personal email addresses,
yes ... [EMAIL PROTECTED] has a nice touch but isn't strictly necessary. > 2.) create job or name specific @cellml.org addresses, for each person, no > 3.) create only one, for 'private requests' (such as security issues) or [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 4.) just have the cellml-discussion address. have both [email protected] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] with examples next to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] of what is appropriate to send to the team. > > The rest is straight forward - this is what we need to decide on. > Remembering that if we put up open addresses, they risk getting spammed > into oblivion, which could potentially cause us to delete genuine emails. But the alternative is that all our @cellml.org addresses get spammed and we junk all of those automatically too. Spam filtering is orthogonal to the address it is sent to. > > > _______________________________________________ > > cellml-discussion mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://www.cellml.org/mailman/listinfo/cellml-discussion > > _______________________________________________ > cellml-discussion mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.cellml.org/mailman/listinfo/cellml-discussion > _______________________________________________ cellml-discussion mailing list [email protected] http://www.cellml.org/mailman/listinfo/cellml-discussion
