On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Dave Taht <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 11:38 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Fri, 26 Jun 2015, Dave Taht wrote: >> >>> Mikael, a simple test of the analysis I just did would be to use >>> ethtool to set your server to 100mbits (ethtool -s >>> your_ethernet_device advertise 0x008 and turn on fq_codel on both the >>> client and server. >> >> >> Hm what do you mean by "client" and "server"?
your topology is: client box - router - server forcing the router - server link to 100mbit will push the egress buffering into the router for the rrul_50_up test in particular. >> Where do you want the queueing to happen? Egress from the WRT1200AC towards >> the server? > > Yes. > >> Then setting the WAN port of the WRT1200AC to 100 megabit/s >> would work, yes. > > Yes, but I am unsure from looking at the driver that using ethtool on > the egress on the wrt1200ac will actually work, but > pretty sure it will work if you set it on the server. feel free to try both. > :) > >> >> -- >> Mikael Abrahamsson email: [email protected] > > > > -- > Dave Täht > worldwide bufferbloat report: > http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/results/bufferbloat > And: > What will it take to vastly improve wifi for everyone? > https://plus.google.com/u/0/explore/makewififast -- Dave Täht worldwide bufferbloat report: http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/results/bufferbloat And: What will it take to vastly improve wifi for everyone? https://plus.google.com/u/0/explore/makewififast _______________________________________________ Cerowrt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
