On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 12:11 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, 26 Jun 2015, Dave Taht wrote: > >> On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Dave Taht <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 11:38 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> On Fri, 26 Jun 2015, Dave Taht wrote: >>>> >>>>> Mikael, a simple test of the analysis I just did would be to use >>>>> ethtool to set your server to 100mbits (ethtool -s >>>>> your_ethernet_device advertise 0x008 and turn on fq_codel on both the >>>>> client and server. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Hm what do you mean by "client" and "server"? >> >> >> your topology is: >> >> client box - router - server >> >> forcing the router - server link to 100mbit will push the egress >> buffering into the router for the rrul_50_up test in particular. > > > No, my topology is <client - router - switch - server>, that is what made me > confused.
> So if I forced the eth0 router-switch link into 100M I will break the > server->client direction (it'll be shallow buffer fifo) but at least > client->server direction will exercise fq_codel on the router. well, maybe the driver will take ethtool on the mvneta. try it. :) > > > -- > Mikael Abrahamsson email: [email protected] -- Dave Täht worldwide bufferbloat report: http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/results/bufferbloat And: What will it take to vastly improve wifi for everyone? https://plus.google.com/u/0/explore/makewififast _______________________________________________ Cerowrt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
