On Fri, 26 Jun 2015, Dave Taht wrote:
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Dave Taht <dave.t...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 11:38 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson <swm...@swm.pp.se> wrote:
On Fri, 26 Jun 2015, Dave Taht wrote:
Mikael, a simple test of the analysis I just did would be to use
ethtool to set your server to 100mbits (ethtool -s
your_ethernet_device advertise 0x008 and turn on fq_codel on both the
client and server.
Hm what do you mean by "client" and "server"?
your topology is:
client box - router - server
forcing the router - server link to 100mbit will push the egress
buffering into the router for the rrul_50_up test in particular.
No, my topology is <client - router - switch - server>, that is what made
me confused.
So if I forced the eth0 router-switch link into 100M I will break the
server->client direction (it'll be shallow buffer fifo) but at least
client->server direction will exercise fq_codel on the router.
--
Mikael Abrahamsson email: swm...@swm.pp.se
_______________________________________________
Cerowrt-devel mailing list
Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
