On Fri, 26 Jun 2015, Dave Taht wrote:
your results are showing basically tail drop behavior. Although I
would have expected intrinsic delay on the link to crack 100mbits on
the rrul test, not 20ms (which is still high), and you only hit 7 on
the single threaded tcp up test, based on what I saw in the driver.
turn off sqm, stay at 100mbit, let fq_codel ride, try the rrul_50_up
test. Also do a capture to see if CE was ever exerted.
http://swm.pp.se/aqm/rrul_50_up-2015-06-27T072819.166452.iperf3_150626_9_100M.flent.gz
I have a capture of this as well, it's 1.5gigs. It has lots of mentions of
ECT(0) but 0 mention of ECT(1). TOS should be 0x3 when the EC=1 ? I see no
such packets. All the packets are 0x2.
http://swm.pp.se/aqm/rrul_50up-100M.pcap.bz2
I went back to gig and set SQM to 50 megabit/s bidirectional and looking
at tc qdisc -s eth0 I see ecn_mark 10339 on a single queue, none of the
others have non-zero ecn_mark.
I do not know why my linksys ac1200 build does not work. I generally
suspect it is because my big build server is getting ancient. Can you
send me your .config file for openwrt?
http://swm.pp.se/aqm/wrt1200ac.config
This was my first try, I haven't fine tuned it yet, but it works (boots
and moves packets anyway :P )
It would be VERY helpful if you pulled from ceropackages-3.14, and
added and built kmod-sched-cake and tc-adv and switched to using the
ceropackages feed also for luci-app-sqm and sqm-scripts. There are a
couple people here that would probably leap on that! :)
I will give it a go in the next few days.
--
Mikael Abrahamsson email: [email protected]
_______________________________________________
Cerowrt-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
