> So a father to be (wed or not) wants the child. The mother to be
> doesn't want the child. Should she be able to abort it against the
> fathers wishes?
>
> If the mother to be wants the child and the father to be doesn't he is
> still responsible for the child for the next 18 years. Yet he has no
> say in the reverse scenerio.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Philip Arnold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, June 04, 2004 8:56 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: Conversation Topic - Abortion
>
>
> > From: Lyons, Larry
> >
> > Not the same situation at all. A collection of cells that
> > cannot exist outside the womb should have the same moral
> > equivalency of a child with a personality, the start of an
> > education, and some idea of right vs. wrong?
>
> But a child doesn't develop a personality until several years - does
> this mean that you can abort upto 1 year old?
>
> I am personally of the opinion that it is the woman's choice
>
> It is her body that is carrying the fetus, therefore it should be her
> choice whether she wants to carry it - nobody should "impose" their
> opinion on that person
>
> Next they'll be telling people that they can't have tattoos, even
> though
> it's their body
> _____
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
