That's asinine. No one threatened violence. I assume everyone read it for the joke it 
was.

Of course the intentions matter to the parents. It matters to everyone.

Walking up to a child with a bomb and detonating it is not the same as accidentally 
killing a child with a stray bullet in a combat zone. For many reasons.

For one thing, the accidental killing is regretted, and will probably be accompanied 
by steps to minimize such accidents in the future.

I will stop now, or I will actually say something I regret.

Jerry Johnson

>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/22/04 10:29AM >>>
> Mr. Johnson wrote:
> It is exactly this sort of [EMAIL PROTECTED] that makes me want to slap "liberals" 
> here in the US. Grrr.

You can get angry, you can hop up and down, you can get red in the face.

The killing of children will continue on both sides despite your lack
of control.  You can say, "this dead child was targeted, but this dead
child was just in the wrong place at the wrong time.  Which is worse?"

I don't think the intentions matter to the parents - dead is forever.

And regardless of what the intentions were the parents will now vow to
kill perpetrators.  And so the cycle will continue.

So threated violence all you'd like - you're part of the problem
unless you're part of the solution and you are clearly not.



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Sams Teach Yourself Regular Expressions in 10 Minutes  by Ben Forta 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=40

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:132277
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to