Of course it doesn't seem logical either. Why take explicit steps to prevent something that doesn't seem to need preventing? Yes, the audience is primarily Americans (many of whom are actually overseas due to Bush's own policies) but that still doesn't make a compelling argument to explicitly block others.
Why bother? Why extend the resources to do it? Jim Davis -----Original Message----- From: G [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 11:28 AM To: CF-Community Subject: Re: Bush Campaign Web Site Rejects Non-US Visitors The site is the "Official Re-election site for George W. Bush". If the site's sole purpose is to appeal to potential voters for re-election of a president in the United States, wouldn't it make sense to try to filter out traffic that most likely will not contain your specific target audience? This doesn't seem that illogical to me. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Purchase from House of Fusion, a Macromedia Authorized Affiliate and support the CF community. http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=37 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:132959 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
