there's a free speech argument for the pharmacist I think but to my mind the bottom line is that he has a job that involves selling pills and he refused to do so. So if you have her right to privacy vs his right to free speech or possible practice of religion..... still think he needs to practice his religion in some other career path.
On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 12:27:12 -0600, G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I got a hypothetical question for ya. > > Lets say the pharmacist refuses to sell the pills. Consequently, the > pharmacy hears of this, and fires the pharmacist on the spot for, basically, > not performing their duties on the job. > > Would the ACLU file suit on behalf of the lady and her right to legally > receive the pills, or on behalf of the pharmacist and his right to refuse to > sell the pills????? > > > > Would they be within their rights if they simply > > > didn't stock the pills? > > > > Yes. that would work. In this particular case, the pharmacist refused > > to fill a perscription for the drug that the pharmacy carries, that is > > ridiculous. > > > > -- > > -- > > > > will > > > > > > "If my life weren't funny, it would just be true; > > and that would just be unacceptable." > > - Carrie Fisher > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Special thanks to the CF Community Suite Gold Sponsor - CFHosting.net http://www.cfhosting.net Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:135216 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
