I agree completely. I am completely frustrated with folks who can't
understand what a separation between church and state means. i.e. if the
reason you tell me it should be illegal involves GOD, then it should be
against your religion, not against the law.
> I do hate to say it, but we do need something official to throw out
> laws which violate the Constitution. Congress sure has a hard time
> passing laws that don't violate our rights. And in a way, it falls under
> the checks and balances duty of the Judicial branch.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 10:00 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: Bush Wins!
>
>
> Lon:
>
> Good response.
>
> Can't find fault with anything you said. Have to agree, even where you
> show
> I was wrong.
>
> Well, I still say it's the job of the court (without being activist) to
> interpret the Constitution.
>
> Otherwise, I agree.
>
> H.
>
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
