ah. It wasn't getting challenged with the same vehemence, so I wondered. That *is* a court case where beyond a reasonable doubt is required and put it this way, I hope you are right. I just find it difficult to construct a conspiracy theory that involves ALL of those people.
I have to pass on arguing predictive value just now, too franticly busy. Perhaps we can come back to this in a few days -- if you're going to read the studies you're asking for :P By the way, I have become impatient at various times in this thread because it has seemed to me that you were asking for proof that blue was blue, but I do think you do deal with facts not opinions and that's a quality I respect. Dana > BTW - not only do I think Mr. Jackson gets the benefit of the doubt, I > think he won't be convicted in his current case and I think there's a > high probability he's innocent. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:154343 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
