I just don't think everyone is prepared (or necessarily able) to
research the stock market enough to make it less of a gamble. It's not
a matter of being unable, but most of the people I know are trying to
find ways to put more hours in their day by _decreasing_ their
workload (where they can, obviously a 9-5 job isn't a commitment most
of us can shorten). To then add an obligatory indeterminate amount of
time to research the stock market (a reasonably confusing subject for
most people) to get an unmeasureable edge against the gamble is I
think a bit ... insensitive to the needs and desires of the average
person. Unless of course they aren't allowed to choose the investments
in which case they're liable to feel even more at the mercy of chance.
I don't blame them for wanting a system that at least seems to them
more predictable. And if the purpose of social security is to help
those who have financial problems later in life as a result of
misfortune or a misunderstanding of economics that makes saving money
for retirement difficult (or impossible) then I think a plan that
allows them to choose the investments will certainly hurt most for the
people it's most intended to help (and help most for those who need it
least). No, I'm not an economist and I haven't read the available
materials -- but neither are most of these people -- I'm just saying I
understand their trepidation.


> The market is a gamble, but not in the same sense as
> roulette. An
> informed, educated person has better chances of making
> money in the
> market than in roulette. In other words, I think a person
> is making a
> mistake if he throws money at a roulette table (outside of
> gambling
> for fun I mean), but I don't think it is a mistake to
> invest in the
> market.

> On 7/14/05, S. Isaac Dealey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> We know that we've taken some of your money... but you
>> know what,
>> we're going to give it all back to you... The only
>> requirement is that
>> when we give it back to you, you have to bet it at the
>> roulette
>> wheel... but that really shouldn't be an issue, because
>> since it's
>> your money, you get to decide what number to bet on.


s. isaac dealey   954.522.6080
new epoch : isn't it time for a change?

add features without fixtures with
the onTap open source framework

http://www.fusiontap.com
http://coldfusion.sys-con.com/author/4806Dealey.htm




~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble 
Ticket application

http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:164770
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to