A coverup of... what? Either it is a crime or its not. If it is, send him to jail. If it's not, don't. What else is there? What are you expecting GWB to do? Why fire the guy if he's not committed a crime? I don't understand your line of thinking, Larry. Am I correct in understanding that you want the President to fire somebody for doing his job, if it's not illegal? So what if it's partisan politics, that's nothing new, and it sounds like you're a big participant yourself. - Matt Small
-----Original Message----- From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 18, 2005 3:34 PM To: CF-Community Subject: Re: Step in the right direction - Bush Vows to Fire Anyone Convicted of Leak It depends on what your definition of IS is. She did not send him. He was under contract from the CIA. She may have recommended him for the job. But she did not hire him. He was very familiar with the area, having served multiple assignments there at all levels with the state department. Moreover he did have no little expertise in disarmament. And this only happened when he had the temerity to disagree with the current administration. She did not scream for an investigation over her outing, the CIA did. So where is the conspiracy? How about a vindictive action by White House staff and a subsequent coverup. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:165178 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
