nothing testible in it, so its not even a hypothesis. undemonstratable and reliant on faith, sounds like an ideology to me.
larry On 8/3/05, Kevin Graeme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It's not a theory. It's a hypothesis. > > On 8/3/05, Jim Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The science of this is pretty clear: taken as presented ID is actually an > > interesting theory when considered rationally. There's some value in it (as > > there is value in all scientific endeavors). > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Purchase Contribute 3 from House of Fusion, a Macromedia Authorized Affiliate and support the CF community. http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=53 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:167895 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
