> -----Original Message----- > From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2005 3:11 PM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re: More on Bush and Intelligent Design controversy > > nothing testible in it, so its not even a hypothesis.
Sort of. I think there are testable aspects to it - but so far none have tested out in such as way as to bolster its case. For example "Irreducible Complexity" is a testable concept, I think. Of course any positive tests could probably never be ultimately confirmed but then again many of our current models don't have ultimate confirmation yet. Anyway any example of "Irreducible Complexity" brought up has been tested to be false. The eye is not irreducibly complex by any means nor is the brain, the In any case there are certain aspects that are still worth exploring. The most interesting to me is "how do you recognize design?" There are huge ramifications to that question in many fields: law enforcement, computer security, artificial intelligence, radio astronomy, etc. As a field of inquiry this is really a fascinating area. Jim Davis ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:167903 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
