> Dana wrote: > Why would what Woodward knows change anything? > It doesn't for the big picture: a person or persons in the administration leaked the identity of a CIA agent to the press - an identity that the CIA, by their own testimony, was going to efforts to conceal.
It may change the strength of the case against Libby. Originally it was rock solid - he was going to the clink until he was pardoned. Now, however, there'll be a bigger hurdle to cross because the defense was saying that Libby was originally pushing Ms. Plame's name and then lied about it. If Mr. Woodward heard about the identity from persons other than Libby, then the case against Libby is not as strong. I'd say it probably goes from a 90% chance of conviction to 70%. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:182542 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
