Then that sort of keeps the union in check, doesn't it? If the threat of layoffs prevents the strike... it's a balance.
- Matt ----- Original Message ----- From: "Nick McClure" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Community" <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 11:51 AM Subject: RE: Whos been walking to work past 2 days? > The problem is when unions abuse this system to place companies in a > situation where they can't compete, or don't want to compete. > > Look at the UPS strike not to long ago, once the strike was over, several > people ended up getting laid off because of the higher wages and the > delays > in shipping. > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Chesty Puller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 11:01 AM >> To: CF-Community >> Subject: Re: Whos been walking to work past 2 days? >> >> I don't quite understand your thinking... a business decides what to pay >> it's employees based on how low it can go. The group of employees gets >> together and decides to get as much as they can. It's the beautiful >> free-enterprise system in play. What's wrong with that? I don't see why >> the business should hold all of the cards. >> >> - Matt > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Purchase Homesite Plus with Dreamweaver from House of Fusion, a Macromedia Authorized Affiliate and support the CF community. http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=55 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:189024 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
