ok. So if you are correct about that it would seem that Clinton may have violated the civil liberties of one person whom he correctly suspected of being a spy. Can we let go of that and take a look at the wholesale violations of the fourth amendment that seem to currently be taking place?
On 12/22/05, Nick McClure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > No, after the fact his aide testified in front of Congress about it, > stating > that the President didn't need a warrant. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Dana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2005 1:27 PM > > To: CF-Community > > Subject: Re: [politics] nobody else seems to be concerned > > > > did he talk to a judge at some point? > > > > On 12/21/05, Nick McClure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > But Clinton didn't have a warrant, that was the point. > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble Ticket application http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:189484 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
