But the fact that the dude wrote it in the 1700s is pretty impressive to me. Although the trend is fairly obvious to us now, I don't think, at the time, it would have been considered common knowledge then.
On 2/28/06, G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ok, I like your explanations much more than that obscure little blurb you > first posted...a few comments..... ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:198253 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
