Even assuming that's all true, if DPW creates a separate subsidiary, staffed by Americans, that operates only the US ports and complies with all of the relevant laws, none of this would be a problem.
>Again, if they are following a practice that is deemed illegal by the US >government, then they have to comply with US government rules if they are >doing business with the US government. As for proving that they are >following the boycott, it's a documented fact in the article due to direct >interview. When you say it has not been proven, are you saying that the >quoted interview was false? > > >> If it is illegal for them to operate in the US while following foreign >> law on foreign soil, then there's your conflict. I don't think that's >> been proven one way or the other conclusively. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:198339 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
