On 2/28/06, Michael Dinowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Again, if they are following a practice that is deemed illegal by the US > government, then they have to comply with US government rules if they are > doing business with the US government. As for proving that they are > following the boycott, it's a documented fact in the article due to direct > interview. When you say it has not been proven, are you saying that the > quoted interview was false?
If you re-read my message you will see that I was saying that it's not been proven that a US law has been broken. Unless, of course, that article was written by a judge currently sitting on the US Supreme Court who is in the majority decision on this issue. A foreign company following a Trade Embargo in a foreign country is not inherently against US law. -Cameron ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:198344 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
