>From that set of documents
http://www.bis.doc.gov/ComplianceAndEnforcement/oacrequirements.html#whatscovered
Section: What do the Laws Prohibit?
"The TRA does not "prohibit" conduct, but denies tax benefits
("penalizes") for certain types of boycott-related agreements."
Looks like it's not all black and white as some think huh?
-Cameron
On 2/28/06, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://www.bis.doc.gov/ComplianceAndEnforcement/
>
> UAE is on the list.
>
>
> On 2/28/06, Cameron Childress wrote:
> > On 2/28/06, Michael Dinowitz wrote:
> > > > A foreign company following a Trade Embargo in a foreign country is
> > > > not inherently against US law.
> > >
> > > It is if the company in question is doing business with the US. If the
> > > company is not doing business with the US, then we can't apply our laws.
> > > But
> > > if they are, they must comply or face penalties. Unless we decide to
> > > ignore
> > > it.
> >
> > You are making the assumption that there are US laws which apply to
> > this situation, and that they have been broken. That is yet to be
> > decided, which is my point. Will definitely make it interesting if
> > they do apply, but so far you've only presented a journalist's
> > viewpoint and not a court's.
> >
> > -Cameron
>
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:198350
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
