Nice spin. Do you really think it is a good idea to engage with Iran at this 
time though?

> I think the award for posturing here belongs to Iran, which has been 
> leading the Europeans around by the nose for three years of worthless 
> negotiations while they have been building the components of a nuclear 
> weapon. 
> 
> As for the perception of the threat posed by a nuclear Iran, you can 
> bet that the U.S. isn't the only government seriously worried about 
> the danger posed by a nuclear-armed, messianc theocracy in the Middle 
> East. Iran doesn't have missiles that can hit the U.S. (yet), but they 
> have missiles that can hit Europe, Russia, and Israel.
> 
> >The US Ambassador to the UN has begun describing a unilateral,
> >unsanctioned,Nuclear attack on a sovereign country which the US
> >*perceives* to be a threat.
> >
> >Just as Iraq was a clear and present danger to the US in 2003, hence
> >the reason for the 'preemptive' attack.
>

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:199629
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to