At your mothers last two schools did they have armed (Guns) police officers patrolling the school during and after school hours? Were people arrested on school grounds for drug possession, sex in the bathrooms, fighting?
Here students that are unsupervised are a liability, they break things and get into trouble. In general students got along with one another when it had to do with race or religion, it was drugs and money that people fought over. I went to school with a kid who was killed in a drive by when he was in the eighth grade, not by accident, he was the target. The guy always had about $2,000 in cash on him. This happens in the schools. If this stuff didn't happen the school wouldn't require a teacher, but it does, so they do. It is not as an endorsement, but to protect the school from being sued, and to keep the school from being burned to the ground. At 07:50 AM 1/29/2002 -0900, you wrote: >My mother has been a teacher and a principal for years - In my experience >sometimes the school allows outside groups to use the facilities after >filling out an application, I don't think they should be able to (or are >able to) pick and choose the groups. If they meet the criteria, they meet >the criteria. If the students fit the criteria (which has nothing to do >with religion) then they should be allowed to be a group that uses the >school after hours. At my mothers last two schools one did not need a >teacher to supervise these groups at all. > >If the students wanted to form a school club (which I am sure is the case >here), which involved religion, which they would have needed a teacher to >supervise, then they would not have been permitted to do so. ______________________________________________________________________ Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
