Looks like it's them vs the Senate Intelligence Committee Report. I'll be going with the latter :)
On 7/13/06, Gruss Gott wrote: > > RoMunn wrote: > > As for the recommendation from his wife > > Looks like you may have bad facts, at least according to the Wilsons: > > <QUOTE> > The Office of the Vice President requested that the CIA investigate > reports of alleged uranium purchases by Iraq from Niger. The CIA setup > a meeting to respond to the Vice President's inquiry. Another CIA > official, not Valerie Wilson, suggested to Valerie Wilson's supervisor > that the Ambassador attend that meeting. That other CIA official made > the recommendation because that official was familiar with the > Ambassador's vast experience in Niger and knew of a previous trip to > Africa concerning uranium matters that had been undertaken by the > Ambassador on behalf of the CIA in 1999. Valerie Wilson's supervisor > subsequently asked her to relay a request from him to the Ambassador > that he would like the Ambassador to attend the meeting at the CIA. > Valerie Wilson did not participate in the meeting. > > As the CIA itself has officially confirmed, Valerie Wilson did not > send Ambassador Wilson to Niger and she neither suggested him nor > recommended him for the trip. Furthermore, the Ambassador agreed to > travel to Niger pro bono with only his travel expenses being paid. > </QUOTE> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:5/messageid:211158 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
