> Doesn't that also apply to Novak? Is the frame of reference law or journalistic ethics? Right now it looks to me like Novak acted as a journalist, but abused his position in doing so. I suppose that you might think that the New York Times acted out of spite, but I don't agree.
> > The other hand is potential harm to this country and eh, > Do you mean Plame? What harm? She was exposed over a decade ago. No she wasn't and no, that isn't what I am talking about. The New York Times was accused of hurting US interests, is what I am talking about. > > if al_Qaeda doesn't already suspect something of the kind is > happening, they are pretty stupid. > > According to the NYT article that exposed this program it was > working: yeah, according to unnamed officials. Those suspects, where are they? Those Islamic charities -- isn't that how we wound up deporting Cat Sevens, for crying out loud? That's the problem with getting all tricksy with your public statements -- people stop believing a word you say. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:5/messageid:211144 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
