Robert, If these documents are dangerous, and prove that Iraq knew what it was doing, why the hell did we publish them and make them easy for terrorists to find?
If these documents aren't dangerous, then they prove nothing, do they? The logic is does not make sense. (From either side) On 11/3/06, Robert Munn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The documents are proof that Saddam, had the French gotten their way, would > almost certainly have an atomic weapon by now. If that isn't proof that we > did the right thing, I don't know what is. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:219525 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
