Actually it proves he was capable of building nukes and the other
documents found with these prove he was supporting international
terrorism especially against the US.

In other words it proves Bush was right to stop him.


On 11/4/06, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > JJ wrote:
> > The logic is does not make sense. (From either side)
> >
>
> And ignoring that, let's say that we had proof Hussein was getting
> nukes.  It proves nothing because the only real thing we proved by
> invading Iraq was that it was strategically stupid no matter what.
>
> Iran WILL have nukes soon.
> North Korea not only has nukes, but has remote delivery systems.
>
> All invading Iraq has proven is that the best way to hobble your
> military and embolden other regimes is to get bogged down in the
> middle of a civil war.
>
> And the ironic thing is that, of the 3, Iran was and always has been
> the best candidate for invasion.
>
> So what's proven is that Colin Powell, the West Point educated
> General, was right and Bush, the intellectually lazy draft dodger, was
> wrong.
>
> Is anyone really surprised?

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four 
times a year.
http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:219538
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5

Reply via email to