it wasn't the UN. It was the New York Times <g> Anyone ever tell you you're cute when you squirm?
On 11/3/06, Robert Munn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > One of two reasons- either a mistake (because the people with the nuclear > knowledge don't speak Arabic and didn't review the docs beforehand, I'm > guessing), or an intentional release as a trap to see if anyone would come > sniffing around. It was only a matter of days before someone from the UN > complained about the docs. That says to me that everyone has been watching > this repository to see if anything juicy comes out. And something did. So > was it an accident or bait? > > On 11/3/06, Jerry Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Robert, > > > > If these documents are dangerous, and prove that Iraq knew what it was > > doing, why the hell did we publish them and make them easy for > > terrorists to find? > > > > If these documents aren't dangerous, then they prove nothing, do they? > > > > The logic is does not make sense. (From either side) > > > > On 11/3/06, Robert Munn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > The documents are proof that Saddam, had the French gotten their way, > > would > > > almost certainly have an atomic weapon by now. If that isn't proof that > > we > > > did the right thing, I don't know what is. > > > > > -- > --------------- > Robert Munn > www.funkymojo.com > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:219534 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
