That's great, but you didn't answer my question. Does the standard that you applied to Jones and the right wingers apply to Clinton and the left wingers? Was it sleazy for Clinton and his supporters like Barbra Streisand and Alec Baldwin to solicit donations to his legal defense too?
Michael Corrigan Programmer Endora Digital Solutions 1900 Highland Avenue, Suite 200 Lombard, IL 60148 630-627-5055 ext.-136 630/627-5255 Fax ----- Original Message ----- From: Larry Lyons To: CF-Community Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 2:07 PM Subject: RE: How to lie your way into the White House - Bush-style I also did not mention all the other anti-Clinton funds that were set up. The whole issue was sleazy. End of story. -- Larry C. Lyons ColdFusion/Web Developer Certified Advanced ColdFusion 5 Developer EBStor.com 8870 Rixlew Lane, Suite 204 Manassas, Virginia 20109-3795 tel: (703) 393-7930 fax: (703) 393-2659 Web: http://www.ebstor.com http://www.pacel.com email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Chaos, panic, and disorder - my work here is done. -- > -----Original Message----- > From: Michael Corrigan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 2:58 PM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re: How to lie your way into the White House - Bush-style > > > What's your take on the Clinton Defense fund where they actively > solicited contributions to his legal defense? Does the standard that > you applied to Jones and the right wingers apply to Clinton > and the left > wingers? > > Michael Corrigan > Programmer > Endora Digital Solutions > 1900 Highland Avenue, Suite 200 > Lombard, IL 60148 > 630-627-5055 ext.-136 > 630/627-5255 Fax > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Larry Lyons > To: CF-Community > Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 1:46 PM > Subject: RE: How to lie your way into the White House - Bush-style > > > A friend of mine is on several right wing oriented mailing lists. > Since > Paula Jones was in the news he's received several mailings > requesting > donations to her fund. And this is despite the fact that she's > received a > lot of other material support from several conservative > groups. Simply > sleazy. > > larry > > -- > Larry C. Lyons > ColdFusion/Web Developer > Certified Advanced ColdFusion 5 Developer > EBStor.com > 8870 Rixlew Lane, Suite 204 > Manassas, Virginia 20109-3795 > tel: (703) 393-7930 > fax: (703) 393-2659 > Web: http://www.ebstor.com > http://www.pacel.com > email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Chaos, panic, and disorder - my work here is done. > -- > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Russel Madere [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 2:44 PM > > To: CF-Community > > Subject: RE: How to lie your way into the White House - Bush-style > > > > > > To paraphrase the sentiment of many here about Clinton, she's > > only human. > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Larry Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 1:37 PM > > > To: CF-Community > > > Subject: RE: How to lie your way into the White House - > Bush-style > > > > > > > > > And not so proud as to try and exploit the issue. > > > > > > larry > > > > > > -- > > > Larry C. Lyons > > > ColdFusion/Web Developer > > > Certified Advanced ColdFusion 5 Developer > > > EBStor.com > > > 8870 Rixlew Lane, Suite 204 > > > Manassas, Virginia 20109-3795 > > > tel: (703) 393-7930 > > > fax: (703) 393-2659 > > > Web: http://www.ebstor.com > > > http://www.pacel.com > > > email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Chaos, panic, and disorder - my work here is done. > > > -- > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Russel Madere [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 2:21 PM > > > > To: CF-Community > > > > Subject: RE: How to lie your way into the White House - > Bush-style > > > > > > > > > > > > Actually Beth, I think Michael's comment was about Paula > > > > Jones, not Monica. > > > > > > > > Paula was not proud to have been harrassed by then Gov > > > > Clinton, she was > > > > quite hurt by it. She never had a cum stain from him, let > > > > alone keep one. > > > > > > > > Russel > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: BethF [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 1:16 PM > > > > > To: CF-Community > > > > > Subject: Re: How to lie your way into the White House - > > Bush-style > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Actually, from my point of view, I think that was propaganda > > > > > because all the > > > > > evidence points to a consensual relationship. She kept his > > > > cum stains > > > > > because she was proud of having the relationship with him. > > > > > > > > > > --Beth, Pseudo usenet cop > > > > > Merlin MTB, BikeE AT, RANS gliss, Trek R200, Kickbike > > > > > Owned by Kavik (Samoyed Boy) and Toklat (Keeshond Boy) > > > > > Anchorage, Alaska > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > > From: "Michael Corrigan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 10:07 AM > > > > > Subject: Re: How to lie your way into the White House - > > Bush-style > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Don't forget why he was being investigated. A woman > > > > accused him of > > > > > > sexual harassment. The very nature of the alleged crime > > > > was sexual in > > > > > > nature so the questions in the investigation had to > > > > revolve around his > > > > > > sexual activity (duh). The apologists for Clinton always > > > > spin it to > > > > > > make it sound that he was being investigated for messing > > > > around with > > > > > > Monica and that it was two consenting adults. According > > > > to Paula Jones, > > > > > > she did not consent when Clinton put the moves on her. > > > > That's where it > > > > > > all began. He lied in the beginning and when they > > conducted their > > > > > > investigation found discrepancies in his testimony. Now > > > > they had to go > > > > > > back a revisit the issue and figure out who's telling the > > > > truth, and on > > > > > > and on it went. It was not about sex, it was about a > > > > crime that was > > > > > > allegedly committed by one person on another. You may > > > > not believe Paula > > > > > > Jones, but I doubt one person on this list would disagree > > > > that it should > > > > > > not have been investigated. The investigation regarding > > > > that case kept > > > > > > ballooning because he kept lying and getting caught in > > > > the process. > > > > > > > > > > > > BTW: Not directed at you Marcus. Your e-mail just > > > > happened to be the one > > > > > > I responded to. This was a general response to those who > > > > maintain that > > > > > > it was sex between two consenting adults when it wasn't. > > > > > > > > > > > > Michael Corrigan > > > > > > Programmer > > > > > > Endora Digital Solutions > > > > > > 1900 Highland Avenue, Suite 200 > > > > > > Lombard, IL 60148 > > > > > > 630-627-5055 ext.-136 > > > > > > 630/627-5255 Fax > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > > > From: Marcus > > > > > > To: CF-Community > > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 12:46 PM > > > > > > Subject: RE: How to lie your way into the White House - > > > > Bush-style > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If its a law thats antiquated and not enforced, then > > > > yes it does. > > > > > > > Have you > > > > > > > seen that list of ridiculous laws that circulates the > > > > internet? If > > > > > > I got > > > > > > > arrested for one of those laws then most certainly, I > > > > would say I > > > > > > had been > > > > > > > wronged. > > > > > > > > > > > > Certainly... But those are laws like don't eat an ice > > > > cream by the > > > > > > lake. > > > > > > Don't wear shorts on Sundays. Laws which make little or > > > > no sense at > > > > > > all, and > > > > > > would fall apart in any court in the land (although why > > > > we haven't > > > > > > gotten > > > > > > them off the books is beyond me). > > > > > > > > > > > > Mr. Clinton's sexual escapades, while by no means a > > > > high crime, were > > > > > > in fact > > > > > > illegal, but that's beside my point. If he had > > stated that his > > > > > > personal life > > > > > > was his own, and he would only answer questions > > > > pertaining to his job > > > > > > as > > > > > > president, I would have still disliked him, but I would > > > > have respected > > > > > > the > > > > > > privacy of what he did and left it to his family and > > > > him to sort out. > > > > > > > > > > > > However, when he 'LIED' to investigators, and 'LIED' > > > > under oath, he > > > > > > changed > > > > > > everything! Like him, if I was caught in an adulterous > > > > relationship, > > > > > > chances > > > > > > are no criminal charges would be filed against me, and > > > > the matter > > > > > > would be > > > > > > between my wife and I. But if I lie under oath, and > > > > they find out that > > > > > > I > > > > > > did... I'll bet you dollars to doughnuts that I go > > > > behind bars... > > > > > > > > > > > > I also feel that while we are all human, the president > > > > needs to be > > > > > > held to a > > > > > > higher standard. > > > > > > > > > > > > Marcus > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
