I wonder...

Using the same 'footprint' that a typical turbine takes up, what would 
be the +/- of wind power produced?  Is it not only more scalable, but 
also more effective?

Another pondering...   Does it produce more power than it would take 
for a fan to produce the effect?

eg.  have a fan pointing at the device and start rotating the 
propeller manually until the device can power the fan, would the device 
be able to push more power than would be necessary to power the fan?

So many questions...  I would love to get one of these and start 
testing with it...

Hmmmm......



-----Original Message----
-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Date: Oct 16, 2007 12:15 
-To: "CF-Community"<[email protected]>
-Subj: Re: Way cool wind energy idea
-
-The idea is that instead of having a prop-based wind turbine, you can
-use a vibrating filament with a magnet on one end moving between two
-coils to produce electricity.
-
-You could have an array of these in much less space than is needed by
-the turbine concept.
-
-Hatton
-
-On 10/16/07, Ian Skinner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-> C. Hatton Humphrey wrote:
-> > http://link.brightcove.com/services/player/bcpid1214137061?
bctid=1233395616
-> >
-> > Very cool idea!
-> I don't get it, how would using giant electric fans to power a few
-> lcd's, a clock and maybe a radio help? :-)
->
-> I don't have audio on this computer so I don't really know what is 
going
-> on there, but it looks interesting.  I'll have to remember to 
review
-> this when I can play the audio.
->
->
->
-> 
-
-


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Check out the new features and enhancements in the
latest product release - download the "What's New PDF" now
http://download.macromedia.com/pub/labs/coldfusion/cf8_beta_whatsnew_052907.pdf

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:244468
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5

Reply via email to