OK.  Fine.  But the gov't should use the same language for everyone, 
then.  As in, "I went before the judge to get a civil union with my 
girlfriend".

If the term "marriage" has any legal standing, then it should be applied 
across-the-board.  Also, if a "marriage" is a religious- or 
culturally-based moniker, then there is absolutely nothing stopping any 
church or other non-government organization from performing marriages.

--BenD

Scott Stewart wrote:
> Why? (not trying to stir up a shitstorm).
> Isn't "marriage" a church function? 
> Shouldn't the government only recognize the union of a man and a woman, man
> and man, woman and woman. And leave church sanctioning out of it?
> 
> I'm all for gay couples having the same rights as hetero couples, but I
> don't think that the word "marriage" should stand in the way of that.
> 


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
ColdFusion is delivering applications solutions at at top companies 
around the world in government.  Find out how and where now
http://www.adobe.com/cfusion/showcase/index.cfm?event=finder&productID=1522&loc=en_us

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:245869
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5

Reply via email to