Gruss,

The reason why I suggested you talk to an attorney is so he or she can
educate you on the basics of what constitutes tortious interference.

Let's say you and I have an agreement that I will pay you to paint a series
of slogans I provide you with on a billboard space that you own, one new
slogan each week, and you begin to do so and I begin to pay you your weekly
fee.  Things are going along smoothly for both of us.  One day I get a Cease
& Desist letter from the attorney of the man who claims to have written
those slogans, in which he threatens me with legal action if I don't comply.
That third party is *not* interfering with the agreement between you and I;
he is demanding that I stop taking an action that he claims is damaging him.
Whether he is right or wrong on his claim, he is not interfering with our
agreement.  The fact that our agreement might be affected by the outcome of
some legal action taken against me by that third party doesn't mean that it
was *interfered* with by that third party in the legal sense.  Even if that
third party gets a temporary restraining order preventing you from
performing your services until judgment has been rendered by the court on
the matter at hand, that is not interference.  Things can change if the
third party becomes overly litigious, but that's generally the way things
work, IIRC.

If, however, that third party persuaded you to not honor the terms of our
agreement, that might be considered tortious interference.

People are free to take legal action when they believe they have cause, and
the law generally protects them from reproach as long as they act reasonably
and in good faith.

Respectfully,

Adam Phillip Churvis 
President
Productivity Enhancement

-----Original Message-----
From: Gruss Gott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2007 8:09 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Someone is trying to sue me

> Adam wrote:
> The party making the claim is not in any way interfering with anything.
>

I'm not agreeing with you mostly because you offer no reasoning other
than "talk to an attorney" which, in the end, still wouldn't matter
because it's not important what some random attorney thinks; it's
important what Baylor's attorneys think a judge MIGHT think and/or how
much work they believe it would be to have a judge who agreed with you
tell Bruce that.

I think the top thing all attorneys will on is that in America I can
sue anyone for anything.



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:248795
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5

Reply via email to